Record Powerball Jackpots Are Teachable Moments for Pension Participants

Analysis November 02, 2022 at 03:57 PM
Share & Print

Any time the Powerball jackpot approaches record territory, the public starts to pay attention.

This week, the Powerball jackpot topped an estimated $1.2 billion ahead of the Wednesday night drawing, sending office workers and construction crews alike to their local gas stations and bodegas to buy their tickets.

Many lottery players have put a lot of thought into what they might do with the winnings. What many Powerball hopefuls overlook, however, is the fact that the $1.2 billion jackpot actually only equates to a present-moment cash value of roughly $597 million. In other words, a jackpot winner who wants their full winnings up front will get only about half the stated value of the jackpot drawing.

For advisory industry professionals, the trade-offs between taking a jackpot cash lump sum versus a stream of guaranteed future payments probably calls to mind the decision facing many pension plan participants upon retirement. Does one accept a lump-sum payment or take the lifetime annuity?

Earlier this year, ThinkAdvisor asked two tax experts to debate the question: William Byrnes, an executive professor and associate dean of special projects at the Texas A&M University School of Law; and Robert Bloink, also of the Texas A&M University School of Law. Byrnes and Bloink are the authors of Tax Facts, a reference solution that helps to answer critical tax questions and explains the latest tax developments.

According to the duo, data shows that large pensions improved their funding dramatically in recent years. Still, pensions remain an unattractive source of risk to many companies, so it is widely expected that those companies may use their increased funding to transfer the risk to an insurance company or offer lump-sum buyouts to participants.

With interest rates on the rise, the pair agree, it is debatable whether now may be the right time for participants to accept those lump-sum buyout offers in lieu of receiving traditional pension benefits as annuity payments.

Arguing in favor of the lump-sum approach, Byrnes points out that higher interest rates mean investors will have access to secure investment options that can generate guaranteed returns even without a pension. He says more Americans should be advised about the choices they can make with respect to annuities and other investment vehicles to tailor their retirement investments to their individual needs.

Bloink, on the other hand, reminds financial professionals that lump sums may be beneficial for some pension beneficiaries, but the fact is that too many retirees who choose to accept a lump-sum option buyout offer aren't managing their funds responsibly. That creates a much more serious risk that their savings will run out during retirement, Bloink warns, when they need income the most.

In the end, Byrnes and Bloink agree: Every pension participant has to carefully evaluate the pros and cons of a buyout offer considering their own situation. For individuals with reduced life expectancies, the buyout may be the most valuable option from a financial standpoint. Others can and do manage their lump sums effectively.

As the Tax Facts authors conclude, this is one of those issues where there is no single right or wrong answer.

(Image: Adobe Stock) 

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center