Retirement industry groups are pressing back against the recent spate of class-action lawsuits that have been filed against 11 firms for breaching their fiduciary duties by offering "underperforming" target date funds from BlackRock in their retirement plans.
The ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC) along with the American Retirement Association and the American Benefits Council filed an amici curiae — or friend of the court — brief Monday in support of Booz Allen Hamilton, one of 11 firms that have been sued for offering the BlackRock LifePath Index Funds, a suite of 10 TDFs.
The suits claim that the BlackRock TDFs "are significantly worse performing than many of the mutual fund alternatives offered by TDF providers and, throughout the Class Period, could not have supported an expectation by prudent fiduciaries that their retention in the Plan was justifiable."
If the suit against Booz Allen is allowed to proceed, it "will put the fiduciaries of defined contribution plans across the country in a no-win situation," the three retirement industry groups state in their brief.
James Gelfand, president of ERIC, which represents large employers that sponsor health and retirement plans, said Monday in a statement that federal courts "should dismiss cases where plaintiffs' lawyers bring allegations based purely on hindsight."
If these cases "are allowed to proceed based solely on the outcome instead of the process used to select funds, the exploding costs and risks of 401(k) litigation will continue to undermine retirement security for workers and retirees," Gelfand said.
So far, there have been 11 "cookie-cutter lawsuits filed by the same law firm in district courts around the country alleging fiduciary breaches by simply offering these TDFs," Gelfand added.
The complaints, Gelfand maintains, "rely on a flawed allegation that because the funds briefly underperformed four plaintiff-selected competitor funds, plan sponsors placed too much consideration on the funds' low management fees instead of eventual returns."
Retirement Groups' Arguments
"In stark contrast to past imprudence suits, which have alleged that fiduciaries should have chosen lower fee and better performing investment fund alternatives, the Plaintiff here claims imprudence exclusively based on the fiduciaries' selection of a BlackRock fund suite that allegedly underperformed — solely on short-term returns — a set of four cherry-picked so-called comparators with little in common with the challenged BlackRock funds beyond the 'target date fund' label," the groups' brief in support of Booz Allen states.
