Investors who wait several months after a bear-market bottom to move their cash into stocks generally fare better than those trying to buy on the trough, an analysis from Richard Bernstein Advisors suggests.
"Many investors insist on buying early so that they 'can be there at the bottom.' Yet history suggests that it's better to be late than early," Dan Suzuki, deputy chief investment officer at RBA, said in a recent post.
The firm analyzed returns for the full 18-month period encompassing the six months before and the 12 months after each market bottom, then compared the hypothetical returns of an investor who owned 100% stocks for the entire period, or "6 months early," with one who held 100% cash until six months after the market bottom, then shifted to 100% stocks, or "6 months late."
"In seven of the last ten bear markets, it has been better to be late than early," Suzuki wrote. "Not only does this tend to improve returns while drastically reducing downside potential, but this approach also gives one more time to assess incoming fundamental data. Because if it's not based on fundamentals, it's just guessing."
In four of those bear markets, the "early" investors saw negative returns over the 18-month period, according to an RBA chart.
(RBA used S&P 500 returns for the full 18 months for the hypothetical "6 months early" investors, and based the "6 months late" investor results on three-month Treasury bill performance as a proxy for cash returns for the first 12 months and on S&P 500 performance for the last six months.)