Are technology and digital advice a threat to human financial advisors?
To find out, Vanguard researchers Paulo Costa and Jane Henshaw in July surveyed 1,518 U.S. investors with at least $100,000 in investable assets who reported having a human advisor, using a digital service or both.
They also conducted qualitative interviews with 25 investors and 15 advisors to understand how and why investors choose human versus digital advice services and the tasks that define each service model.
The research showed that study participants believe advice provides higher incremental portfolio value than going it alone, regardless of delivery method, but digital services do not threaten an advisor's book of business.
Ninety-three percent of human-advised clients said they would use a human advisor in the future, whereas 88% of robo-advised clients said they would consider switching to a human.
Costa and Henshaw quantified the value that investors perceive in human and digital advice services across a three-pillar framework of portfolio, financial and emotional outcomes. They found that human agents excel in all dimensions.