SIFMA, ICI Support DOL's ESG Proposal for 401(k) Plans, With Modifications

News December 15, 2021 at 05:03 PM
Share & Print

Financial trade organizations for the financial markets have submitted very different responses to the Department of Labor's proposed rule that allows 401(k) plan fiduciaries to choose investments based on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors.

SIFMA, which represents 80% or $18 trillion of broker-dealer client assets, 50% or $34 trillion of investment advisor AUM and 70% or 263,000 U.S. financial advisors, and the Investment Company Institute, which represents asset managers overseeing $32.7 trillion in the U.S. for more than 100 million U.S. shareholders, generally supports the proposal but wants modifications.

The American Securities Association, ASA, which represents regional financial services firms, opposes the proposal on the grounds that it would "weaken protections for retirement investors."

A group of four Republican senators who are ranking members of Senate committees on Aging, Finance, Banking and Health, Education and Labor — Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Mike Crapo, R.-Idaho; Pat Toomey, R-Pa.; and Richard Burr, R-N.C. — also want the proposal scrapped.

The ASA and the four senators accuse the DOL of playing politics with investors' retirement funds. That's also the case with most comments from individuals made public on the DOL site, who accuse the federal government, in a sentence or two, of interference in their retirement accounts.

In comparison, Better Markets, a nonprofit independent organization founded in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to promote the public interest in the financial markets, supports the DOL proposal in its comment letter.

The proposal amends a restrictive rule adopted by the Trump administration, which has not been enforced by the Biden administration following an executive order.

SIFMA's and ICI's Comments

Both SIFMA and ICI welcomed the latest DOL proposal for clarifying that retirement plan fiduciaries may consider ESG factors in evaluating plan investments without putting themselves at regulatory risk.

"The proposal makes clear that ESG factors should be treated the same as any other economic factors. We appreciate the Department's work to provide this much-needed certainty to the retirement plan community," said ICI General Counsel Susan Olson in a statement.

But both trade organizations asked for modifications to the proposal that adopt a more neutral approach to ESG-focused investments.

SIFMA, for example, suggested that a section that says a plan "may often require an evaluation of the economic effects of climate change and other ESG factors on the particular investment or investment course of action" change "require" to "would not preclude" such an evaluation.

The ICI suggested the wording be changed to "may include" and it also favored removing the term "ESG" from the rule's text. The term was "unnecessary" and "risks drawing distinctions between ESG factors versus other investment factors … potentially creating confusion about definitions and inviting litigation," according to the ICI.

The DOL Proposal

In general the proposed rule clarifies that fiduciaries should prudently consider any factors that could affect the value of an investment, including climate change and ESG factors as part of the prudent risk/return evaluation of an investment option.

It iterates plan fiduciaries' duty of loyalty, which requires them to put the interests of plan participants above the interest of the plan and evaluate investment options based on factors they have prudently determined to be material to an investment's value.

Nonfinancial collateral benefits may also be considered when plan fiduciaries use the "tie-breaker" standard to choose among investment options, according to the proposal rule.

The proposal also allows for ESG funds to be used as Qualified Default Investment Alternatives (QDIAs), which are the default investment options used when a plan participant fails to choose his or her options, and it eliminates restrictions on fiduciaries on proxy voting contained in the Trump era 2020 rule.

The DOL will now review the public comments before issuing a final rule.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center