Ed Yardeni: Why 70-Plus 'Panic Attacks' Haven't Killed the Bull Market

Q&A December 14, 2021 at 12:50 PM
Share & Print

The long, booming stock market has been "the most hated and feared bull market that any of us have experienced, maybe in history." That could be "one of the reasons [it] keeps going higher," argues Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, in an interview with ThinkAdvisor.

"Investors have been 'spook[ed]' by the 2008 financial crisis," he says. This has resulted in what the strategist, who consults to institutional investors, large RIAs and government policymakers, calls "panic attacks," when the market plummets.

"I've counted 71 panic attacks since the beginning of the bull market in 2009 — and they all turned out to be buying opportunities," says Yardeni, who, over the years has correctly called several booms and busts. 

The most recent panic attack "was the day after Thanksgiving because of the omicron scare," he says. But he is bullish on both the economy and the stock market and sees no recession en route.

Before going to Wall Street, he was an economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the U.S. Treasury.  Then he spent 25 years at firms including Deutsche Bank, EF Hutton (where he was dubbed "Dr. Ed") and Prudential Equity Group.

Discussing inflation, he says that the American Rescue Plan "certainly seems to have triggered the surge we've seen of late."  "Bidenflation," as he calls it, "created a demand shock that overwhelmed the supply system." But "the market doesn't seem to be concerned" about the potential of hyperinflation, he notes.

Yardeni's expectations for the Federal Reserve's next moves are "doubl[ing] the pace of tapering," then raising interest rates in May. The market anticipates three rate increases, he maintains.

The strategist, an active blogger, believes that the coronavirus will "be with us for a long time, maybe forever." But he predicts no further lockdowns.

"The worst economic impact of the virus was caused by the policy of lockdowns in March and April of 2020," he says.

In the interview, he provides his forecast for corporate earnings and the implications of the now-flattened yield curve.

ThinkAdvisor interviewed Yardeni on Dec. 10. He was speaking from his base in Brookville, New York, on Long Island. 

In Dr. Ed's view, that was a short bear market we experienced in March 2020, sort of. Actually, he says, it was "more of a panic attack."

Here are excerpts from our conversation:

THINKADVISOR: Do you use any particular methodology on which you base forecasts?

ED YARDENI: Yes. My common sense. [I use] current analysis: You look at the world as you know it today based on the data.

You analyze it and then come up with your theories, instead of the other way around, which is you start out with your theory and look for data to support it.

That's the way economists, in general, do it.

We're living in an unusually uncertain environment. Yet the stock market continues to rise. Why?

It's the old climbing the wall of worry.

What's your outlook for the market?

It's a bull market. This has been a great bull market that started in 2009. What we saw in 2020 was a bear market. But it didn't last long: It was more of a panic attack.

I've counted 71 panic attacks since the beginning of the bull market, and they've all turned out to be buying opportunities.

You just kind of close your eyes and maybe lie down for a while and then get up and see that the market has recovered.

When was the most recent panic attack?

It occurred the day after Thanksgiving because of the omicron scare. That lasted one day, and the following Monday the market was up.

The following Tuesday the market was down — another panic attack: [Federal Reserve Chair] Jerome Powell was [getting] hawkish because inflation was turning out to be more persistent than transitory, as he had thought.

And now, here we are with the market doing extremely well.

Why have all these panic attacks occurred?

We had such a terrible bear market during the great financial crisis that it's pretty easy to spook people that things are going to go bad again.

But maybe that's one of the reasons the market keeps going higher. It's been the most hated and feared bull market that any of us have experienced, maybe in history. 

It's not one where everybody is wildly bullish all the time.

When do you think the next bear market might hit?

It will be preceded by some event in the credit market — a financial crisis — that's fairly limited at first and becomes more widespread. It will look like an economywide credit crunch, which then causes a recession. 

Also, in the past, surging oil prices have been associated with recessions.

But I just don't see either of these events happening in the next couple of years.

So you don't see a recession on the way?

No, I don't. There are certainly elements of the great inflation of the 1970s all over again, when ultimately Paul Volcker [former Federal Reserve Chair] allowed interest rates to go up to whatever it took to bring inflation down.

But I don't see this [current inflation] turning out to be Volcker 2.0. The market doesn't seem to be concerned about it.

How come?

The big difference is productivity, which collapsed during the 1970s. Productivity growth has been on a rebound since 2015.

Now it's around 2% at an annual rate. I think it's going to 4% by the second half of the decade, which would be very important in offsetting some of the inflationary pressures and allowing wages to rise faster than prices.

What do you think the Fed's next move will be?

It's likely to decide at its meeting [this] week to double the pace of tapering. That's pretty well discounted in the market. 

It would put the Fed on track to be done with tapering and in a position to start raising the interest rate and the federal funds rate, probably at their May meeting.

The market expectation is that there'll be three rate hikes.

What's your outlook for corporate earnings?

We've definitely seen the peak growth rate during the second quarter. The fourth-quarter numbers will probably be in the same range as the third quarter's.

Economic growth in the fourth quarter looks like it's going to be surprisingly strong.

Next year settles down to the historical trend of 6% to 8% growth in earnings. 

That's what drives the market higher but on a single-digit base, not on a double-digit base since valuation multiples are so high already.

However, profit margins stay high, which has been a major contributor to earnings' strength.

Has the current labor shortage been caused mainly by people quitting their jobs?

Part of that is workers quitting — but for various reasons: some to get better jobs with better pay, some to retire. 

The baby boomers are a big age cohort that's retiring at a faster pace but barely being replaced by new entrants into the labor market for demographic reasons.

Is the labor shortage a result of the pandemic?

The fact is that prior to the pandemic, labor-force growth was around 0.5%. So the underlying chronic shortage in the labor market had already appeared before the pandemic. 

After we started opening up the economy, it reappeared.

Companies started to realize that this is a long-term issue that's not going to be resolved anytime soon and that they need to increase the productivity of the labor force they have.

Fortunately, there are all sorts of technological innovations that lend themselves to increasing the mental and manual productivity of workers. That's what I'm expecting.

Resuming our discussion on inflation, you've said that "Bidenflation was unleashed" by President Biden's American Rescue Plan [ARP]. So can we blame all the inflation we're experiencing on Biden?

No. It's not all caused by Biden. The Fed contributed to inflation with its $120 billion worth of bond purchases, which in turn contributed to the increase in liquidity in the system.

There's a tremendous amount of liquidity still, as a result of the stimulus provided by monetary and fiscal authorities since the beginning of the pandemic.

Some of that can go into continuing to fuel economic growth.

And it's obviously fueling price inflation. But it's also going into the stock market.

To what extent was ARP responsible for current inflation, then?

It certainly seems to have triggered the surge in inflation that we've seen of late. It created a demand shock in the United States, which has contributed to global inflation.

All those ships bobbing up and down outside the L.A. ports are reflective of the enormous demand for goods that was stimulated by last year's checks and easy monetary policy. 

ARP created a demand shock that overwhelmed the supply system.

You recently warned, "Watch the yield curve because it could be a possible indicator of trouble." Please explain.

It's fascinating to watch the yield curve as the markets digest the latest Fed news that they'll most likely taper at a fast pace and start raising interest rates sooner.

The yield curve has flattened out.

Historically, investors tend to buy bonds when they perceive that the Fed is starting to deal with inflation by raising short-term interest rates.

The Fed could very well get to the point where short-term rates start to bite into the credit system and potentially create a financial crisis.

What the yield curve has been suggesting of late is that because interest rates have been so close to zero for so long, it's not going to take much of an increase in the short-term rate to have the impact of slowing the economy and moderating inflation.

The bond market seems to be anticipating that.

Where does the coronavirus — and its variants, omicron and delta — figure into everything that you've said in this interview thus far? 

I think we're learning to live with it. We've seen a tremendous increase in the number of people who have been vaccinated, at least in the United States.

The virus is going to be with us for a long time, maybe forever, just the way the influenza virus is with us. We struggle to come up with the right vaccine every year to deal with the latest mutation. Life goes on.

Do you predict another coronavirus-induced lockdown?

No. We've seen that the worst economic impact of the virus was caused by the policy of lockdowns in March and April of 2020.

Ever since we've been opening things up, we've had extraordinary economic strength and growth.

We're recognizing that there are flare-ups of this pandemic that need to be treated locally with whatever restrictions are necessary — but not lockdowns.

The economic damage was too high. So I don't see us going to lockdowns again.

Your most recent book is In Praise of Profits! (October 25, 2021, YRI Press). What's its main argument?

It's a defense of profits because profits have been under attack. There are still plenty of people who have almost a Marxist view of profits: If you have a profitable company, you must be exploiting somebody.

So profits have gotten a bad name in many of these circles. In some, profits is a four-letter word.

But in fact, profits are the very driver of our prosperity. It's the profit motive that motivates entrepreneurial capitalists to come up with the best goods and services at the lowest prices for customers.

America still has a tremendous amount of entrepreneurial capitalists [as distinguished from] crony capitalists, who hire lobbyists and use political power to rig the markets.

Entrepreneurial capitalists account for more than half the employment in the United States.

And there's a lot of venture capital available to fund entrepreneurs with new ideas.

(Photo: Ed Yardeni)

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center