Investors in Brazil. (Photo: AP)
Institutional investors, far from rushing to safety in the midst of the turbulent end to 2018, are selling Treasuries, according to an analysis from State Street.
State Street recently issued a new Bond Compass report aggregating fixed income flow data to capture behavioral trends across tens of thousands of bond portfolios. This is the second issue since the quarterly publication launched in October.
The report leverages analysis from State Street Global Markets showing bond flows and holdings indicators from Q4 2018, taken from a data set that represents $10 trillion of assets, which is estimated to account for just over 10% of outstanding fixed income securities globally.
This data showed that institutional investors aren't rushing to safety, but rather are selling Treasuries. Also, in December at least, institutional investors began to dip a tentative toe back into Italian and emerging market debt.
"This was a surprisingly upbeat set of readings to begin 2019," the report states.
Treasuries
The data found that — despite record issuance — Treasuries returned their best quarter in three years in the fourth quarter. This is thanks to the risk aversion, softer U.S. economic data and a change in Federal Reserve commentary that happened in the quarter.
"Surprisingly, while the outperformance of Treasuries relative to other markets lifted the value of investor holdings, investors responded by continuing to sell Treasuries across the curve," the report found.
In contrast to the last big Treasury rally in the first quarter of 2016, investors clearly do not expect the fourth quarter's gains to be repeated, according to State Street.
State Street also found that total demand for Treasuries was unusually weak.
"There is a bearish interpretation of this, which is that investors are anxious about rising political risk in Treasuries, reflected in the ongoing U.S. government shutdown and rapid rise in issuance," the report stated.
However, State Street doesn't think this is the main driver because there would likely be much weaker primary demand from institutional investors if so.
