Maria Vullo (Photo: NYDFS)
Although New York state regulators have threatened to block CVS Health's proposed acquisition of Aetna Inc. over concerns about price hikes for consumers, it's unlikely that the deal will be derailed, corporate lawyers interviewed said. But the lawyers added that, given the worries New York has, the deal is probably not a done deal just yet.
"In my general experience, when something is approved at the federal level, it's highly unlikely that it doesn't ultimately get approved at the state level," said Shannon Zollo, a partner in Boston-based Nutter McClennen & Fish's corporate and transactions department and chair of the firm's mergers and acquisitions practice group. "But I wouldn't be surprised if the states require some additional concessions in order to approve the deal."
During a public hearing earlier this month, New York State Department of Financial Services superintendent Maria Vullo expressed concerns that CVS, which had to borrow $40 billion to fund the proposed $69 billion acquisition, could raise insurance premiums for millions of residents.
"New York Insurance Law provides that I, as the superintendent, shall disapprove an acquisition if I determine that such action is reasonably necessary to protect the interests of the people of this state," Vullo said, according to a written version of the statement she made at the hearing.
Despite an August plea from California to block the deal, the U.S. Department of Justice announced earlier this month that it will approve the Woonsocket, Rhode Island-based retail pharmacy giant's purchase of Hartford, Connecticut-based Aetna, assuming the latter divests its Medicare Part D prescription drug plan for businesses and individuals. Connecticut regulators also approved the deal earlier this month, but New York remains wary and the only apparent roadblock to the merger.
While each state has the authority to investigate and ultimately reject such deals, the extent to which they do so varies, Zollo said. For example, it's not surprising, he added, that California, Connecticut and New York—all of which have "massive amounts of commerce and a history of significant M&As—want to analyze these types of deals as they relate to their states and their populations."
