(Image: Thinkstock)
The Securities and Exchange Commission recently withdrew two no-action letters that allowed investment advisors to rely on third-party proxy voting services as long as the advisor had policies in place to ensure independence.
The agency's Investment Management Division stated in its Sept. 14 Information Update that the securities regulator wants to revisit the regulation of proxy voting services at its upcoming Roundtable on the Proxy Process in November.
IM staff recently re-examined the letters that the staff issued in 2004 to Egan-Jones Proxy Services (May 27) and Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (Sept. 15).
"Taking into account developments since 2004, the staff has determined to withdraw these letters," IM said. The notice of withdrawal of the letters is designed to facilitate the discussion at the roundtable and the agency is eager to receive "information and feedback from stakeholders with multiple perspectives at the roundtable."
The SEC "wants to consider whether investment advisors are 'relying on proxy advisory firms for information aggregation and voting recommendations to a greater extent than they should, and whether the extent of reliance on these firms is in the best interests of investment advisors and their clients, including funds and fund shareholders,'" stated Cipperman Compliance Services, in a note about the withdrawal.
The Egan-Jones and ISS letters "provided a de facto safe harbor for advisors to rely on third-party voting services. Their withdrawal and upcoming roundtable open the door to additional requirements on advisors to supervise proxy voting," Cipperman said.
