The stock markets were unhappy Friday when President Donald Trump moved to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. Trump even tweeted "trade wars are good, and easy to win."
Not so fast, says Ben Inker, head of asset allocation for Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Co.
"He is wrong, and beyond the simple fact of his wrongness, a trade war is probably more dangerous for investors at this time than at any other time in recent history given the implications it would have for inflation, monetary policy, and economic growth," said the GMO board member in a note to investors on Friday.
"The only positive from the tariffs is that it is a windfall profit increase for U.S. producers of steel and aluminum, which is at least positive for them," he explained.
"It is unlikely to cause any material increase in U.S. capacity to produce steel and aluminum and therefore unlikely to lead to many additional jobs even in those sectors," Inker said.
How bad could the consequences be?
"The negatives are much more significant," the asset specialist wrote. "I believe these tariffs on their own will push inflation higher, and higher inflation is a threat to the valuations of more or less all financial assets today."
Other consequences of Trump's moves are that a trade war would boost prices on a broad swath of goods and services, while lowering aggregate global demand.
"This pushes us in the direction of not just inflation but stagflation, where both valuations and corporate cash flow would be under pressure," Inker explained.
While a significant inflation problem could be the worst thing to happen to a balanced portfolio, producing losses on the order of 40%, he adds, a global trade war would "be exactly the kind of economic event that could foreseeably lead to losses of that magnitude."
Job Losses How are jobs lost in a trade war?