How to risk proof retirement

Proponents of the systematic withdrawal approach can argue that their simulation-tested portfolios meet clients' essential income needs and provide growth potential. Zwecher cites several reasons behind his preference for flooring. First, sequence of returns risk—i.e., a series of significantly negative investment returns as the client retires—can deplete a portfolio much more rapidly than anticipated. Second, people tend to retire after a bull market run and near a market peak—not unlike the current environment—increasing the likelihood they're about to encounter a bear market. Third, unexpected financial shocks can cause serious problems for a retirement income plan. Finally, drawdown plans' success is sensitive to longevity. While it's possible to reduce a client's spending rate to offset this risk, the reduction might result in an unacceptably low income for the client.

After building the case for the flooring method, Zwecher draws on his experience in financial services to show how traditional accumulation portfolios can be adapted for retirement income without disrupting a client's portfolio or the advisor's business. He covers insurance solutions, both annuities and longevity products, but he also discusses investment strategies for flooring needs and discretionary wealth. The book spends some time on the academic theory behind flooring, but the heavy-duty material is reserved for an appendix. It's not a fast read—I had to read the more technical sections several times—but it's a very informative guide to an important retirement income planning method.