The Big Dollar Case That Got Away

January 10, 2012 at 01:57 PM
Share & Print

One of the biggest errors financial salespeople make is to presume logic dictates a client's decision-making process. On the contrary, especially among higher-premium cases, what often matters most is packaging.

At the end of the day, knowing and understanding the buyer's thought process and personal value system is the smartest way to approach your next big case. Anecdotes and analogies speak to some; others prefer hard numbers with diagrams and a flow chart. Before every sales pitch, spend some time thinking about what communication style will resonate with your prospect.

It's all in the details

Sometimes a seemingly insignificant detail determines whether you win new business or go home. When stakes are high, buying decisions may not have anything to do with you, your product offering or your value proposition. Instead, the decision might be determined by your client's history.

Let's look at two specific instances where psychology was the determining factor in making or breaking a five-figure premium sale. In the first example, the agent fails to pitch in a way that's relevant and interesting to the prospect. In the second, the opposite is true. 

Case 1: The self-made entrepreneur

Mr. X is a 51 year-old, unmarried male. He's the owner of a construction company in Florida and is interested in employing cash value life insurance and its inherent civil litigation protection aspects after reading a SmartMoney magazine article. By nature, he's a renegade entrepreneur, trained to thoroughly investigate every new proposition that comes his way.

Mr. X contacts his business banker for an introduction to a local insurance specialist. At their first meeting, the insurance specialist asks questions about loads, fees and mortality rates. Worse, the conversation gets off on the wrong foot by opening with a sixteen-page insurance illustration.

This is a clear case of information overload and it doesn't mesh with the client's untrusting nature, which stems from a notoriously unforgiving profession (construction project bidding). The insurance agent shows a clear lack of understanding of his prospect's background personally and professionally. Thirty minutes later, a disenchanted Mr. X refuses to answer underwriting questions and hear an explanation of the mechanics involved in life insurance policy design. The meeting is terminated and X is never heard from again.

Now, let's diagnose the situation. What three key things went wrong?

  1. The agent didn't try to answer the question, "Why does this prospect want asset protection?"
  2. The basics were glossed over. Loads, policy fees and policy premiums do not matter unless the plan type and funding mechanism dynamics are addressed. It differs greatly from buying kitchen flooring.
  3. The information presented was too difficult to understand. A life illustration to the general public right off the bat? Seriously? Why not show him Sanskrit or the results of an MRI?

A better approach would have been to take the time to relate a policy's design to something the prospect was familiar with – say, a kitchen remodel. Always speak in your prospect's terminology and convey your aim to think as he or she does rather than throwing proposals and interest rates at someone. Just because you know the rates are great doesn't mean your prospect does. 

Case 2: The affluent retiree

Mr. Y is a 74-year-old male, retired from a thirty-year career as physician and university lecturer. His goal is to liquidate or replace three policies purchased over the years and reduce his taxable estate. He also wants to donate to two charities in the names of his two children.

The solution? Replace the original cash-heavy policies with two joint-survivor life policies on Y and his spouse, with ownership going to 501(c) charitable organizations. It's simple enough, except for a medical underwriting snag.

Mrs. Y qualifies for preferred rates. Mr. Y, however, is table-rated due to his medical history. Further complicating things, the former doctor disagrees with various test results (and the subsequent less favorable class rating) as it reduces the insurance donation amount.

This case triumphs for one reason: the insurance team takes Y's presence as a medical authority and his consumer attitude into consideration. After gaining full support from the case's underwriter, a conference call between Y, his endocrinologist and the insurance carrier's medical director is facilitated.

The three speak in medical terminology about the risks and disposition at hand until a manageable compromise is reached. The underwriter approves the case at a three-year flat extra and standard rate class. Ultimately, the case is placed to the buyer's (and charity's) delight, with commissionable premium in the $78,000 neighborhood on each of two policies.

In conclusion

Products come and go. The newer, feature-rich policies of today dictate a relatively short shelf life for even the strongest portfolio, which means it may be wise to update your client's coverage as circumstances and priorities change over time. To do this, it's important to know your client's psychology as much as possible. Only then are you well prepared to pitch a sale.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center