State vs. Federal, Round Two

January 04, 2012 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

Rep. Steve Stivers (R-Ohio)

A panel of the House Financial Services Committee (FSC) reported out on December 9 legislation to the full committee that would significantly restrict the ability of federal regulators to get financial information from insurance companies.

The bill, H.R. 3559, the Insurance Data Protection Act of 2011 was sponsored by Steve Stivers (R-Ohio) and was approved along party lines. The vote was 7-5, with Republicans supporting it and Democrats opposing it.

The bill was taken up by the Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing and Community Development Committee.

It is unclear when it will be reviewed and voted on by the full FSC.

Rep. Luis Guttierrez (D-Ill.), ranking minority member, objected most vociferously to the legislation.

He said it was an industry-written bill, and protested the provisions stripping the Federal Insurance Office (FIO) of its subpoena powers.

Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.) also opposed the legislation "for now." His concern was with the provision that required federal agencies to comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act in collecting financial information from insurers.

Stivers said he would work with Guttierrez and Capuano "as much as possible" to deal with their concerns before the bill is taken up by the full committee. "We're not trying to roll anyone over," Stivers said.

He said the purpose of bill is to make sure the FIO is not a regulator, but is merely an information-gathering entity and to make sure it is collected in the most efficient means possible.

The bill would revoke the authority of the FIO and the Office of Financial Research (OFR), two new entities created by the Dodd-Frank Act, to subpoena data from insurance companies.

The bill also would require the FIO, the OFR, the Financial Stability Oversight Council, and any other federal entity that seeks data about insurance companies to obtain that data through the insurance company's state regulator, another federal agency, or a public source.

R.J. Lehmann, deputy director of the Heartland Institute's Center on Finance, Insurance and Real Estate in Washington, was highly critical of the legislation.

He said it is understandable that insurers would want to avoid costly and duplicative data requests, but said DFA already strictly limits the FIO's ability to collect data from insurers, and grants it the power to issue subpoenas only when it cannot gather information any other way.

Lehmann interprets the bill as saying the bill "would leave the office completely beholden to the states and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners for any and all information it might need."

Lehmann said that, "could potentially compromise the office's charge to make recommendations to Congress on ways to improve and modernize the state-based system of insurance regulation."

More troubling, Lehmann said, the bill would place new restrictions on the office's ability to share with other agencies or the general public any "non-publicly available" data that it receives.

He said that while Dodd-Frank already provides protections for confidential information, such as industry trade secrets, "handcuffing the FIO's ability to share even non-confidential data, such as insurers' statutory financial reports, goes against the office's central charge to disseminate information about insurance markets, as well as the requirements of the federal Freedom of Information Act and Dodd-Frank's goal of promoting transparency in financial markets."

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center