Dealing with LTCI Objections, Part 1

August 04, 2011 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

Long-term care insurance has been around long enough with sufficient public awareness to ensure that the "sign me up" cases are a thing of the past. That means you're likely to encounter objections to buying the coverage–some valid, others not. Overcoming these objections will mean the difference between getting the coverage in place or not. Here's how experienced LTCI advisors respond to some of the most common objections you're likely to encounter.

It costs too much. Cheryl Sherrard with Rinehart Wealth Management in Charlotte, N.C., puts the LTCI annual premiums in the context of what a year's care would cost in a skilled care facility. This helps clients compare the annual LTCI premium of $2,000 or $3,000 with skilled care costs of approximately $70,000 per year in Sherrard's area. "It takes 23 years of paying premiums of $3,000 to equal one year's care costs," she points out. "It is also helpful to remind them that in the case of a married couple, not only would you have the skilled care cost for the sick spouse, but you would continue to have all the normal living expenses for the well spouse. That can easily deplete a portfolio in a very short timeframe."

Kevin Meehan with Summit Wealth Advisors in Itasca, Ill., reminds retired clients that much, if not all, of their income will continue if they need long-term care. Those sources can include pensions, Social Security, portfolio income and so on. Consequently, prospective buyers often don't need to insure the full LTCI cost, and Meehan focuses instead on covering the potential expenses that would exceed their cash flow. Framing the need that way–meeting the gap, not the full potential cost–gives clients a sense of relief that they don't have to cover the entire LTC expense. "Couples respond differently if one is disabled as far as where they spend the money," he says. "Typically the healthy one isn't going to Europe anymore. And so a lot of their variable expenses change because somebody is ill. Some of what is being spent now may be freed up to go toward this care. So what we want to do is say 'What's the gap and then let's buy that much coverage.' Sure, ideally, all the risk is transferred, but realistically most people don't have the premium tolerance to do that."

The cost issue isn't just about money, though–it's also about having clients recognize their values, set financial priorities and decide how they would change their lives if they needed LTC. Ted Gregory with Gregory Advisors in Huntington Beach, Calif., has his clients identify their values and near-, medium- and long-term goals as part of the financial planning process. He uses that information to develop a detailed financial model with two scenarios for the clients. The first scenario assumes no LTCI and the present value of convalescence at an agreed-upon age. The second scenario assumes the client has LTCI with the benefit applied to the cost of the same convalescence. Gregory then shows the clients how the different scenarios would affect their ability to achieve their goals. The result: Clients frequently either agree to purchase LTCI or substantially modify their stated values and goals, he says.

Sign up for The Lead and get a new tip in your inbox every day! More tips:

Ed McCarthy has worked as a freelance writer and author since 1991. His specialty is explaining complex financial topics in understandable language. Before becoming a writer, he worked as a financial advisor and he is still licensed as a Certified Financial Planner (CFP).

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center