AALU Speaker: Save the Breaks You Have

May 02, 2011 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

This is a year for life insurance industry representatives to try to preserve the existing tax treatment of life insurance rather than to promote new tax incentives, a speaker told Association for Advanced Life Underwriting (AALU) members today.

Bill Richardson, a former Democratic New Mexico governor and former Clinton administration ambassador to the United Nations, spoke here during the opening general session at the AALU's 2011 annual meeting, which started Sunday and is set to run until Wednesday.

Members of AALU, Reston, Va., are preparing to meet with their congressional representatives Tuesday afternoon, during House and Senate town hall meetings.

Richardson encouraged AALU members to take a defensive approach this year because of lawmakers' heightened focus on reducing the federal budget deficit and the national debt. Federal tax benefits for life insurance policyholders, such as the tax-deferred growth of cash values in permanent policies, could be a target for legislators seeking new sources of revenue, he warned.

Richardson said the next congressional battle — over budget cuts and efforts to raise the nation's debt ceiling – could affect the nation's ability to tap the capital markets.

"Debt ceiling discussion in the next three weeks will [impact] American's international standing and our economic recovery," Richardson said. "Our ability to govern will be tested. My hope is that you will tell [both Democrats and Republicans] not to dig in, and to avoid politicizing the issue."

The recommendations of the bipartisan Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, chaired by Alan Simpson, a former Republican senator from Wyoming, and Erskine Bowles, the former chief of staff to President Clinton, could provide political cover on the deficit and debt issues as Congress seeks a political consensus, Richardson said. He said he supports passing a constitutional amendment to provide for a balanced budget over a 15-year period.

"Almost every state has to balance its budget," Richardson said. "Why can't the federal government?"

Richardson added that a constitutional amendment may be necessary in part because of a lack of civility in political discourse. Republican and Democrats "don't talk to each other," he said, observing they pay more attention to their constituents, bloggers and political pundits on cable TV.

"The process of authorizing and appropriating funds almost no longer exists," he said. "What we have now are continuing resolutions to put off the next tough decision. It's gotten to the point where Congress is almost paralyzed."

Richardson said he supports a proposal to try to end the political gridlock on the debt ceiling by having a commission made up of economists resolve the issue. That would free Congress to focus separately on budget questions, he said.

"You might say [that a commission] will allow members of Congress to avoid the responsibilities they were elected to do," Richardson said. "I say: Precisely. We've reached a point where this debate is no longer valid on policy grounds. It's gotten too political. I hope this proposal gets traction."

During a question-and-answer session, Richardson predicted that bin Laden's killing will boost President Obama's approval rating to above 50%, from a level in the mid-40s before the killing was announced. He also expressed confidence in the likelihood that the president will get reelected, but he acknowledged that a Republican dark horse candidate could present a serious competitive threat.

He identified three potential candidates as possibly being dangerous to Obama: Gov. Mitch Daniels of Indiana; former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, who has been President Obama's ambassador to China; and Sen. John Thune of South Dakota.

The Republican field will be ill-served by the media continuing to focus on issues that might alienate independent voters, such as the legitimacy of President Obama's birth certificate, Richardson said.

Richardson also questioned the role of the Tea Party in advancing Republican aspirations.

"With all due respect to the Tea Party, I don't think it's a constructive force in American politics," he said. "Their people could make [election campaigning] difficult for the Republican candidates."

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center