The special risks that wealthy families and individuals face are different from those faced by lower-net-worth clients. These high-net-worth clients often have large, sometimes multiple homes, businesses and international interests. They travel—and so do their children. They are often public faces and personalities, with outsized risks to reputations that other clients just don't face. And social media makes any wealthy person or family a potential target of scammers or criminals.
In this slide show, we look at the options advisors have when it comes to proactively protecting clients from natural disasters, and from themselves.
Protecting Clients' Home(s)
"Most people start with what they know," when it comes to risks, says James Kane, president, HUB International Personal Insurance. They go from the 'fender-bender, baseball through the window" to the less typical risks, and may not get to the more catastrophic risks until much later.
Too many insurance brokers or agents look at the "risk management strategy in terms of product placement, when they need to look at the risk management first, not product placement," Kane (right) explains. Rather, they need to help clients to "look at the risks that you think put you out of business."
For instance, lots of high-net-worth clients have multiple homes, Kane points out. Maybe, he says, they should "self insure" the "hunting lodge in Virginia that would cost $300,000 to rebuild. The premium that they'd have spent on the lodge may be better applied to the "$10 million estate [home]; think about insuring that," and using a higher, "$200,000 deductible" to keep premium costs in check, Kane explains.
Protecting your wealthy clients from acts of God, acts of employees, and disasters of their own making.
Protecting Clients Against Home Invasions
High-net-worth families are concerned with their "lack of preparedness" and want to have a "crisis mitigation plan for the family." The "earthquake, tsunami, the FBI investigating hedge funds—it's the perfect storm of risk permeating the high-net-worth community," says Paul Michael Viollis Sr., CEO of Risk Control Strategies, Inc., in New York.
There has been an increase in requests from wealthy families or individuals, Viollis says, to become aware of and plan for the unexpected. "I've never seen a groundswell like 2011—it started in the fourth quarter of 2010. Families are especially concerned with their personal safety at home. They [want to] link preparedness over multiple generations and want to protect their family brand and legacy."
"Home invasions have increased exponentially," Viollis (right) says. A frightening thought, to be sure. In part, the economy and disparity in this country between those with the highest of incomes and so many who are struggling may play a part. But perhaps the biggest contributing factor is the Internet—it is a vast playground for "cyber-hacking" and related social media rifts in privacy. In fact, Viollis says, privacy has been "eliminated" by the internet, and where your wealthiest clients may always have been targets for theft, extortion or ransom, the internet makes it easier than ever for smart criminals to target and get to those clients.
Viollis cites single-and multifamily offices as being "clearly not prepared" for this type of cyber threat: a family sets up an office to manage their $700 million, the CEO and CFO do a great job managing the financial aspects for the family, but their expertise doesn't extend to the server holding the family's most sensitive information—portfolios, and all other aspects of financial, and very personal data. They hire that out to IT people, "who are great for baseline solutions—but not if you're a real target," Viollis cautions. This is a vulnerable area. Now they now what your clients have, their account numbers, potentially other information.
Protecting your wealthy clients from acts of God, acts of employees, and disasters of their own making.
Protecting Clients From Earthquakes
It is more useful to "take the most severe chance of loss, plug those holes, and work back to the common risks," says James Kane, president, HUB International Personal Insurance. The better question to ask, Kane argues, "Is it critical to insure against earthquake and tsunami or am I better off insuring against fire and other, more frequent risks?"
Here is the insurance paradox in a nutshell. Take earthquake risk: the risk itself is "fairly predictable" but where there is a "significant fault you can't get it, or it is unaffordable." Kane uses the "New Madrid Fault near St Louis" as an example. It has been dormant for a long time and they don't have "building codes like they do on the West coast" where earthquakes are more frequent, so there are, near the New Madrid Fault, "a lot of older stone houses," that may not be up to a trembler. In this case, "many wealthy homeowners will self-insure."
Protecting your wealthy clients from acts of God, acts of employees, and disasters of their own making.
Protecting Clients From Tsunamis and Floods
Flood insurance covers tsunami risk or "inundation from outside," says Kane rather than, for example, drains backing up. And if a home collapses from flooding of any kind, "collapse would be covered," he says. But what if the land is now underwater? "Some carriers will not pay until you rebuild;" Kane notes, while others will pay "cash for the value of the house."
But the reality is, he says, that in the catastrophic, high-profile disasters—Hurricanes "Andrew, Katrina" the big carriers are "not going to apply the rules" and will be more likely to pay. With urging by the presidential administration during some recent disasters, the companies "paid a lot of claims they would not typically pay."
Basic flood insurance is a federal insurance policy with limits of $250,000 on a building and $100,000 on its contents, Kane explains. It can be relatively inexpensive if clients are not in the worst flood zones, and some mortgage companies require the coverage if clients are in particular flood zones.