As investors continue to have a very low level of trust in the financial system, according to a new study, wealth managers who want to see their firms grow and thrive again will have to take four steps or risk further diminution of their wealth management businesses.
The Chicago Booth/Kellogg School "Financial Trust Index" reported on Jan. 24 that investor "trust in the financial system" lingers at 26%, up from 20% from two years ago, in January 2009, the heart of the visible financial crisis. The fact that 74% of investors distrust the financial system two years later poses a real risk to the viability of financial services firms large and small, as well as their clients' retirement goals and other investment plans. It is crucial that investor trust be regained. But how?
Part of the issue at hand is that not every individual wants to invest. But with the demise of the 5% insured bank savings account and the proliferation of the defined contribution retirement plan and IRAs, most individuals are investors whether they want to be or not. The investment playing field is complex and nowhere near level—there is a gap in knowledge between investor and intermediary that cannot reasonably be closed. This underscores the need for good advice and increases the risk that if investors don't receive advice that's in their best interest, they won't be financially equipped to retire. It's a poignant note to investors' distrust of the financial system.
Wealth Managers will have to take steps with legislators, regulators, colleagues and their own firms to help restore investor confidence in the capital markets:
1) Get Congress to fully fund the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)—or better yet, make the agency self-funded like other financial regulators. Either of these choices won't cost taxpayers a cent, but will help investors regain trust in the capital markets, something that is sorely lacking—and for good reasons.
The SEC raises millions—in some years hundreds of millions of dollars—more than Congress appropriates to it each year. Congress in December froze SEC funding at 2010 levels until March and now there's a move to decrease it to 2008 levels. If funding issues continue, the SEC has said it will have to lay off, potentially, 600 staffers, something that won't help investors regain confidence in investing. It may have to pitch all registered investment advisor (RIA) oversight to FINRA or a new self-regulatory organization. While the lack of SEC oversight might make some giddy at first blush, remember, some entity will be appointed to supervise RIAs. What entity do you want that to be? Do you want RIA oversight to remain" principles based" rather than "rules based" as brokers are regulated? For RIAs, according to the SEC's "Study on Enhancing Investment Adviser Examinations" there are three recommendations, one of which is FINRA oversight.