Wall Street's Golden Goose

February 06, 2011 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

The final report of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) on the causes of the economic catastrophe that struck in 2008 was released Jan. 26.

For those who make their living in the insurance business, its retelling of the near-collapse of American International Group Inc. (AIG) is a stunning read.

In terms of assets, AIG was largest insurance company in the world at the time, with sterling credit ratings. Ironically, it was the misuse of those very ratings that made AIG's financial strength an illusion.

According to the report, a principal culprit in the company's downfall was a little-known division headquartered in London, AIG Financial Products (AIGFP). Its focus was to deal in over-the-counter derivatives such as credit default swaps (CDS). AIGFP built a portfolio valued–only on paper as it ultimately turned out–at $2.7 trillion.

AIGFP achieved those sales by leaning on the high credit ratings of its parent. As one of its top executives told the commission, "no one wants to buy disaster protection from someone who is not going to be around."

AIGFP's CDS guaranteed debts such as bonds, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations held by banks and other institutions. Initially, most of the customers for these instruments were European banks that, in return for a stream of payments, were assured AIGFP would cover their losses if the borrowing institution defaulted.

These CDS were not insurance per se, but did a good impersonation of it. Precisely because they were not insurance, though, AIG did not have to set aside reserves to cover any losses. So AIGFP was in effect setting up its parent company for a lethal financial setback in 2007, when mortgages plunged in value.

In 2004 and 2005, AIGFP started selling similar protection to U.S. banks that wanted backing for their holdings of mortgage-backed securities and other investments so they could lower their own capital requirements. It sold collateralized debt obligations in tranches valued at $54 billion.

AIGFP held $379 billion in CDS by 2007.

One AIG executive told the commission that the unit's top sales rep for these swaps was "the golden goose for the entire Street."

AIGFP's sales of credit protection on various assets grew from $20 billion in 2002 to $533 billion in 2007.

It agreed to post collateral for these CDS contracts if the value of the underlying securities dropped or if the rating agencies downgraded AIG's long-term debt ratings. That promise ultimately proved disastrous. In early 2005, AIG lost its triple-A rating after auditors found it had manipulated earnings. Eventually, that led to Maurice "Hank" Greenberg resigning as CEO.

In his own testimony to the FCIC, Greenberg said that when AIG lost its triple-A rating, it should have gotten out of backing CDS or at least reduced its presence in that business. Other AIG executives told the commission that by 2005 they were getting increasingly worried about the extent of AIG's commitment to CDS in view of the high percentage of subprime mortgages they were backing. Yet AIGFP sold another $36 billion in CDS in 2005. And it completed 37 deals between September 2005 and July 2006–one of them on a CDO backed by 93% subprime assets.

In July 2007, this house of cards began its long, slow collapse. Goldman Sachs sent a margin call to AIG for almost $2 billion on super-senior credit default swaps because their market value had declined.

Ultimately, in September 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank stepped in to enable AIG to meet its need for increased collateral, in return for giving taxpayers an 80% stake in the company.

The tale told in the Financial Crisis Inquiry Report is one of acute corporate mismanagement and inept Federal regulation. Unfortunately, in all probability the report will not lead to kinds of regulatory changes needed to mitigate a similar financial disaster in the future.

The report shows AIG executives were not doing their jobs. Regulators, too, including the Federal Reserve and the Office of Thrift Supervision, blundered.

It remains to be seen whether Wall Street and Washington will take steps to assure a similar financial crisis will not happen again. Sadly, it appears the financial system is not much different today than before the crisis.

Because of the deregulation of over-the-counter derivatives, state insurance regulators were blocked from regulating AIG's sale of CDS. That continues to be the case.

Efforts to reform the system through the Dodd-Frank Act seem feeble, largely due to the ability of big banks, with allies in government, to block the excessive use of the types of derivatives that led to the failure of the entire financial system. What the whole dismal episode shows is the need for more regulation. Unfortunately, what we are hearing out of Washington right now is that we need less.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center