The President's Terrible Two-Step

Commentary January 25, 2011 at 07:46 AM
Share & Print

Forgive the petulance, but judging from the prepared text, tonight you'll find more honesty and intellectual heft in Paula Abdul's "Dance Dome" than anything in the Capitol dome.  

In the run-up to the "State of the Union," the Wall Street Journal reported Monday on the language contained in directives to the EPA on how to decide what constitutes onerous regulation that tamps competitiveness and job creation. What they found were terms like "equity, human dignity, fairness" and "distributive impacts."

One official stated that her mission is in "explicitly integrating environmental justice considerations into the fabric of the EPA's process."

All good things, to be sure, but this was an administration that promised to bring science back to the debate. Someone want to explain to me how human dignity and fairness are numerically quantifiable? It's part of the president's cynical sleight-of-hand we reported on last week, which unfortunately will be on full display in tonight's speech. He'll nod to deficit reduction while outlining his plan to increase the nation's global competitiveness; a plan that includes more government "investment" in infrastructure, energy and education. Where have we heard this before?

The results of his two-year Keynesian play are on full display, and I won't recount them here. I'm no fan of the Republicans' plan, but at least it includes the tough choices and sacrifices we were told we would eventually have to face (by Obama himself in the run-up to his inauguration).  I thought − and hoped − he got the message from the November election. I was wrong.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center