Benefits Cost Versus Value: The New Math

January 12, 2011 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

Employee benefits competition has traditionally been defined by cost – all things being equal, the most affordable provider usually got the enrollment.

But that was then. Now, as health care reform, health care inflation, the emergence of voluntary benefits, and increased cost-shifting from employers to employees changes the benefits landscape, there are new opportunities to make benefits offerings more valuable for employers. Convenience, simplicity, and increased employee satisfaction are some of the values that producers can now emphasize.

To consider how value replaces cost as a factor in purchasing decisions, look no further than your friendly neighborhood Walmart and Target stores. For years, Walmart defined itself by price. Store design and layout was an afterthought, and products were stacked high to the ceilings. The shopping experience basically consisted of saving money.

But then, Target made a push to differentiate itself by making the shopping experience itself a value, with stores that had a more contemporary look and design. Target's brand was still big-box and low-cost, but consumers could enjoy the experience as much as the cost saving. Walmart is still the leader in the big-box market, but Target is a strong second, and Walmart now brings more attention to design and layout to its stores. The shopping experience has become an important value to consumers.

How does that translate to benefits? The enrollment process is a shopping experience that many employers dread because of the paperwork, the complexity, and the strains on HR resources to process benefits from several carriers. But if a broker can make the process easier and less time-consuming for the employer, that clear value may rival cost.

Some carriers are recognizing this by packaging their products in bundles so that there is one process, one enrollment, one application, and one bill. Producers may want to suggest offering a menu of products that can be bundled, with employer-funded products offered alongside a list of voluntary plans. This allows employees the flexibility to select from the voluntary column based on their needs, and only work through one carrier on one application.

Incidentally, there's also value for the producer: Bundling and packaging is a fairly painless way for brokers to diversify and enter the voluntary market, where much of the business is moving anyway. It also allows producers to offer their clients more innovative client solutions, and provides diversified revenue to offset the potential effects of reduced health care commissions.

Steve Howard is vice president of Benefit Solutions, a division of American General Life Companies. His monthly blog on ASJonline addresses issues and trends in the insurance industry. He can be reached at [email protected].

For more employee benefits coverage, visit ASJ's Employee Benefits Resource Center

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center