Experts Foresee Increased Advanced Planning Opportunities

January 09, 2011 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

Wealth transfer planning among the high net worth is likely to increase in 2011. A host of factors, including low interest rates and asset valuations, the improving economy and, not least, pending legislation impacting income and estate tax rates, will fuel the surge, sources tell National Underwriter.

"The new tax package will be wonderful for advisors," says Debra Repya, the senior director of advanced markets at Allianz Life Insurance Co., Minneapolis. "The legislation, an improving economy, low interest rates and the growing population of boomers turning 65–all these things point to renewed interest in retirement, estate and business planning."

Adds Michael Ricke, a principal of Protecting and Preserving Wealth, New Albany, Ind.: "The tax bill will provide a foundation I can work with. We'll have two years worth of rules, and you need to know what the rules are to play the game."

The $858 billion tax bill, which at press time the Senate had passed and was due for a House vote, extends unemployment benefits for 13 months, cuts payroll taxes 2% and extends current income and investment tax rates for all income brackets. Most significantly for advisors, the package raises the estate tax exemption amount to $5 million for individuals and $10 million for couples; and it reduces the top estate tax rate to 35% from 55% on estates exceeding the exemption amounts.

The bill will thus provide a much-needed boost to an advanced planning arena that advisors found wanting in 2010. An anemic economic recovery following the 2007-2009 recession and uncertainty as to Congressional action on the estate tax conspired to suppress interest in planning and, among those with pre-existing plans, to slow or halt their funding last year.

Ricke, a 28-year industry veteran, says that many of his clients in 2010 were "paralyzed" by doubt as to the economic and legislative landscape. Todd Heckman, a principal of Estate Planning Advisors, Vero Beach, Fla., adds the dismal environment cut his business considerably: At year-end, he was finalizing only his 3rd estate planning case–down from the 8 to 12 cases he regularly completed in prior years.

While contributing to an improving market for advanced planning, the tax bill is nonetheless seen as a mixed bag by some experts. Like the Bush-era tax law it replaces, the legislation comes with an expiration date: December 31, 2012.

That time limit, says Rick Scruggs, a MassMutual adviser and principal of Financial Designs, Lynchburg, Va., may "frustrate" advisors and clients looking to do long-term planning. Bill Seawell, a senior vice president of GA and ABGA distribution at Lincoln Financial Group, Philadelphia, expects also a "significant reduction" in qualified prospects for wealth transfer planning and irrevocable life insurance trusts because of the high exemption levels.

Caveats aside, market-watchers say certain techniques will thrive in 2011, due in large measure to continuing low interest rates and asset valuations (such as on securities and real estate). These factors reduce estate and gift tax exposure, allowing clients to pass more appreciating assets to beneficiaries without taking a tax hit. Among the promising strategies: grantor retained annuity trusts, charitable lead annuity trusts and intentionally defective grantor trusts.

Other planning vehicles are being touted because of the flexibility they offer clients to meet current needs. Example: the spousal lifetime access trust, a type of ILIT that provides access to policy cash values while also keeping death benefit proceeds out of the grantor/insured's gross estate.

"Clients are less concerned about irrevocably parting with assets if there is a possibility that they can access funds when needed," says Mark Teitelbaum, a vice president of advanced markets for the wholesale channel of AXA Distributors, New York. "The spousal access trust would allow a grantor's spouse to receive discretionary distributions from a trustee."

Also enjoying heightened interest is the private split-dollar plan: a technique wherein an insured (or spouse) and (usually) an ILIT "split" the costs (premiums) and benefits (cash value and death benefit) of owing a permanent life insurance policy. When properly implemented, contributions to the trust incur minimum gift tax. And the death benefit passes free of estate tax and the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax.

Teitelbaum says many clients holding cash-generating illiquid assets, such as rental properties and businesses, are attracted to a variation of the technique called an "orchard loan." Loaned to the trust, the assets are used in place of cash to pay the ILIT's policy premiums.

"Producers and clients often only think of private split-dollar as useful only for liquid assets," says Teitelbaum. "This variation provides an option for individuals who are illiquid. We've finalized four to five large cases in the past year using this solution."

The caseload for AXA and others has been less active in the charitable planning space. Because the recent market downturn pummeled investment portfolios, affluent individuals have given fewer lifetime gifts to favored organizations using common donor planning techniques, such as the charitable lead trust (CLT), charitable remainder trust (CRT) or the family foundation.

Charitable planning might have been expected to increase, says Seawell, if income tax rates were allowed to rise under the new tax legislation, given the charitable deductions available under the tax code. But Repya suggests a rise in capital gain rates could increase interest in techniques (such as the CRT, insured installment sale and private annuity trust) that allow individuals to defer capital gains tax.

Whether or not donor-based planning increases in 20011, says Ricke, advisors would do well to market a vehicle that helps charities boost cash flow without increasing market risk to their investment portfolios: an income annuity. Purchased using a portion of the charity's investments, the income annuity would designate an individual (such as a board member) the annuitant. But the income payments would go to the charity.

"If the individual dies early, the death benefit–the income payments remaining to be paid–would come back to the charity," says Ricke. "In a worst case scenario, the charity will be made whole. In a best case scenario, the individual will live longer than anticipated and the favorable cash flow will continue to the charity on an annual basis.

"I expect to be spending a lot more time in the year ahead describing this technique to various charities," he adds.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center