The number of Morgan Stanley financial advisors — including those involved in the joint venture with Smith Barney — fell by about 50 to 18,087 during the quarter from the previous period. It declined by 2 percent from the second quarter of last year, when the firm had 18,444 FAs. But this figure still gave it the most advisors of the four wirehouse firms, topping Bank of America-Merrill Lynch by nearly 3,000 brokers.
Morgan Stanley said that its global wealth-management clients withdrew net $5.5 billion during the second quarter, including net outflows of $7.9 billion in the United States and net inflows in overseas offices of $2.4 billion. In the first quarter, the wealth-management operations had net inflows of $9.3 billion.
The company's total client assets of $1.5 trillion at the end of June were down 6 percent from the first quarter, but topped last year's $1.42 trillion. "It was a tough environment for retail investors, especially post-flash crash," said CFO Ruth Porat in a conference call with equity analysts in late July, adding that clients often withdraw funds during tax season.
Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman stated several months ago that the company's goal is to boost client assets by $20 billion. In late July, Gorman said that Morgan Stanley is "not overly concerned" with the $5.5 billion outflow. This represents about $10 million in revenue per quarter or $40 million in yearly sales, he added.
Morgan Stanley has a 51-percent interest in the joint venture with former-Smith Barney owner Citigroup.
Advisor turnover in the top two performing quintiles (or the upper 40 percent in terms of fees and commissions) "is low," according to Porat. In terms of the movement of teams out of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, she says there "isn't much."
In early July, MSSB attracted two teams from UBS in New York and Canton, Ohio, for instance, while in late May it lost a Charlotte, N.C.-based team to Baird.
Average annualized revenue per adviser also fell slightly, to $679,000 from $685,000 in the first quarter. It grew slightly over the same period last year, when average annualized sales per broker were $671,000.
Morgan Stanley said it closed 24 brokerage branches globally during the quarter as part of its Smith Barney venture. It now has 881 branches.
Morgan Stanley's wealth division posted a profit of $110 million, up 11 percent from the first quarter, on flat net revenue of $3.1 billion. The pretax profit margin fell to 7 percent from 9 percent during the first quarter. Again, Gorman had given an aggressive target for the 2010 performance in this area: 20 percent over the next year or so.
"We still expect to meet this target at the end of the integration," said Porat, though — like other targets, such as $1.1 billion in cost savings — it is being pushed out from 2010. "These are valid targets, but it's a question of timing," she explained.
In terms of the integration of Smith Barney, "The focus is on getting a series of steps done, which we are, and keeping the sales force stable, which it is, and giving the clients what they want," Morgan said during the analysts' call.
Companywide, Morgan Stanley reported income of $1.4 billion, or $0.80 per share, for the quarter ended June 30, compared with a loss of $138 million, or $1.36 per share, for the same period a year ago. Net revenues were $7.95 billion for the current quarter vs. $5.2 billion a year ago.
Including discontinued operations, the company reported EPS of $1.09 vs. a net loss of $1.10 last year. Discontinued operations included an after-tax gain of $514 million related to the sale of the retail asset management business, including Van Kampen Investments to Invesco. Analysts had expected earnings of $0.46 a share on sales of $7.93 billion.
Recently, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney appointed James Tracy as chief operating officer of distribution and development for wealth management in the U.S. and Douglas Ketterer as head of its private-wealth management unit in the U.S.
What's next for the largest wirehouse? "I think Morgan Stanley Smith Barney will focus on streamlining and upgrading its sales force now, so the number of financial advisors may fall," said Chip Roame, head of Tiburon Strategic Advisors in Northern California. "But, I'd expect those dropped to have fewer assets [than those that stay]. Thus, the firm will decline a bit in FAs and go up in assets."
MSSB is likely to focus on its top and mid-size advisors, adds Roame, which should boost both average production and total assets for the firm.
Merrill Lynch
BofA's wealth-management operations, led by Sallie Krawcheck, reported higher asset-management fees and brokerage income in the second quarter of 2010; these operations include Merrill Lynch and U.S. Trust. The wealth-management unit had $2.24 billion in fees and brokerage income in the most recent period, which topped $2.15 billion in the first quarter and $2 billion in the same year-ago period. Total client assets, however, fell about 9 percent from the first quarter, which the company says was a result of market volatility and the sale of Columbia Management in May.
Merrill Lynch had $1.7 billion in fees and brokerage income in the second quarter vs. $1.5 billion a year ago and $1.6 billion in the first quarter. BofA's wealth-management operations reported nearly $2 trillion in client assets, with some $1.4 trillion at Merrill Lynch. Merrill's assets declined $50 billion from the first quarter but grew $92 billion over the same year-ago period.
Merrill Lynch has 15,142 financial advisors vs. 15,005 in the previous quarter and 15,008 a year ago. On average, assets under management per broker are about $92.5 million.
The advisors' annual production average, based on fees and commissions in the first half of this year, is $836,000. Based on second-quarter results, annual production was about $853,000 vs. $823,000 a year ago.
In the second quarter, BofA introduced the online brokerage, Merrill Edge, which received 20,000 referrals resulting in 7,000 contacts, according to the company.
How does Merrill maintain such a high figure for its average production per rep? "It's always been that way, thanks to a focus on high net worth," explains Roame. Much of the advisor force of rival Morgan Stanley comes from the former Dean Witter brokerage firm, he points out, which aimed to serve Middle America.
Merrill, like UBS, has more high-net-worth clients than some other wirehouses, he adds, but Morgan Stanley could catch up. As for Merrill Edge, Roame remarks, while the jury's still out, it could end up like an earlier online-brokerage effort that frustrated many advisors.
In the second quarter, BofA's wealth-management division reported $4.3 billion in total revenue, $3.2 billion of which came from Merrill Lynch. This represents a nearly 4 percent increase for the unit compared to the first quarter and a 2.5 percent jump for Merrill Lynch. The total revenue includes the asset management fees and brokerage income, as well as interest income and other income.
Despite rising revenue, the unit had a 23 percent decline in net income from the first quarter, to $356 million, as non-interest and income tax expenses rose. Within the group, Merrill's net income was $316 million, a 12 percent fall from the first quarter.
The earnings figures show Merrill Lynch contributing about 11 percent of Bank of America's overall revenue and 10 percent of its net income, while the wealth-management unit makes up about 15 percent of Bank of America's total revenue and 11 percent of its net income.
Bank of America, the parent company of Merrill Lynch, reported profits of $3.1 billion, or $0.27 per share, on $29.2 billion of revenues in the second quarter of 2010 vs. profits of $3.2 billion, or $0.33 per share, on $32.8 billion of revenues in the same year-ago period.
Though the full impact of the recently passed financial reforms on Merrill remains unclear, equity analyst Richard Bove of Rochdale Securities does not anticipate that BofA will increase wealth-management fees to cover fees lost in its retail bank operations. "That would be a bad business practice," he explained.
BofA executives, Bove notes, didn't outline how the bank will respond to new financial-reform regulations that are expected to negatively impact retail banking and other fees — though they certainly will do something. For instance, fees on retail-bank accounts and merchant services could go up, he says, but not fees in the capital-markets and wealth-management units.