Fund Portfolio Solutions from a Top Advisor

Commentary July 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM
Share & Print

Each month we ask an advisor about the mutual funds he or she would consider for a simplified client scenario. Here's this month's scenario:

Clients (married couple) are in their mid- 70 s, in good health with $250,000 available to invest. The need maximum income – at least $1,000 per month – to cover their living expenses and are not concerned with leaving a legacy to heirs. Both spouses are conservative investors and uncomfortable with "stock market" volatility. However, they understand the impact of inflation and are willing to accept gradual depletion of principal to meet their income needs.

What research tools do you use to identify prospective funds for clients?

We start with a relationship with our custodians — Raymond James, Charles Schwab, Fidelity — using their research and available tools as a beginning point. From there we go to Thompson Reuters to do some additional research. Some people within the office use Morningstar, but my personal preference is Thompson Reuters. For a third view of the situation, we go to Fiduciary Analytics fi360's w ebsite, where we are registered as advisors.

What specific fund categories would you recommend for this scenario, and why?

We looked primarily at income-producing assets, but not necessarily fixed-income bond portfolios by themselves. We felt that in the current interest rate environment, with interest rates apparently going to rise in the near future, being 100% in fixed income would probably be a detriment rather than a positive . S o we looked at utilities as one sector that would give them a fairly steady income with less volatility.

We've looked at equity-income as well, to give an increase in growth. And then we looked at preferred and convertibles as two other areas that we felt would give some downside protection, as well as some upside.

We used closed-end bond funds or closed-end stock funds entirely for two main reasons. One, at this time, most were trading at a discount, which would be an enhancement to the income. Number two, we could put stop losses on the portfolio wherein if the clients felt that they were getting uncomfortable with a major market correction, they could be out in a short period of time automatically without necessarily having to watch it every day.

What specific funds and allocations would you recommend within those categories?

We weighted the most — $100,000 — to income and preferreds, and we divided that into three separate closed-end funds. The first was Neuberger-Berman Income Opportunities (NOX). We put $25,000 in that. The next was TCW Strategic Income (TSI) for $50,000. The third was $25,000 in the John Hancock Preferred Income Fund (HPI). The differences were yields ranging from a low of about 5 1/2% up to a high of 9 1/2%, enough to generate the kind of income we were looking for.

In the convertibles, we divided it with $25,000 each into Putnam High Income Securities (PCF) and Calamos Convertibles (CHI). The Putnam fund was yielding a little over 7% and the Calamos was yielding over 9%, selling at the current discount.

Rounding out the portfolio with equity-income, we chose Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Fund (VIG), an ETF, with $25,000 there. The $75,000 that was left went into two utilities funds. One was an ETF, Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU), with $50,000, and the utilities sector SPDR, symbol is XLU, with $25,000.

The results would be — based on their current yields — an approximate yield of 6% on the total $250,000 portfolio or the equivalent of $1,265 a month to give them the monthly income they need now, with potential appreciation, so that this would keep up even with a future inflationary situation.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center