The year 2010 is on track to be very interesting for wealth managers. Because no tax reformation has been enacted as of this writing, what we had previously thought of as impossible has become a reality: 2010 will be known throughout the planning community as the year of no federal estate or generation-skipping transfer tax.
It is expected that Congress will take action and reinstate the estate tax at some point in 2010. But it should also be noted that our logical expectation of how Congress would behave is precisely how we in the financial planning community became subject to this current period of uncertainty. So as we wait for Congressional action–or for the expiration of the repeal and subsequent reinstatement of the estate tax in 2011–I suggest that wealth managers focus on planning opportunities for achieving client goals that are almost certain to stay around, regardless of future changes in tax law.
Roth IRAs and estate planning opportunities
2010 provides wealthy clients with a chance to implement planning that until now had been unavailable to high-income earners. The Tax Increase and Prevention Reconciliation Act of 2005 made this the year in which the modified adjusted gross income limitations associated with converting retirement plan balances to a Roth IRA would be eliminated. So a Roth conversion in 2010–and in subsequent years, assuming that income limitations are not reinstated–may be a fantastic opportunity from the retirement planning standpoint and may also provide often-overlooked estate planning benefits.
Pluses and minuses of the Roth IRA
A Roth IRA provides several advantages when compared with a Traditional IRA. It allows clients to accumulate after-tax dollars and earnings in a tax-deferred account that can later be withdrawn completely tax-free. Additionally, while the account owner is alive, it is not subject to the required minimum distribution (RMD) rules associated with a Traditional IRA. Typically noted downsides are the need to contribute after-tax dollars, the $5,000 contribution limitation ($6,000 for individuals ages 50 and over), and the previous income limitations that had made it an inaccessible planning tool.
There are two ways to fund a Roth IRA:
1. Through contributions (including those to Roth 401(k)s and 403(b)s that are subsequently rolled into Roth IRAs)
2. Through conversion
Who should convert?
Now that there are distinct advantages for a wealthy client to convert to a Roth, the question becomes, should he or she do so? There are a number of factors to mull over. One is that an important variable is missing from the conversion equation: future income-tax rates. As a general guideline, the Roth conversion makes sense for clients who expect to be in a higher income-tax bracket in the future, for those who are currently in the highest tax bracket and expect to remain in that tax bracket in the future, for clients with large income-tax deduction carry-forwards, and for those who expect to face estate-tax liability.