Economic, demographic and regulatory forces have traditionally shaped the direction of life insurance offerings. This will continue in at least eight areas. First, let's consider what has already happened:
–The business saw the rise, fall, and rise again of term wars in the last decade, in an environment of improving mortality and overly-conservative reserve standards.
–Survivorship products enjoyed solid success until the fate of estate taxes became a guessing game.
–A rising equities market supported a steady rise in variable life sales, but a plummeting market with low interest rates torpedoed this since VLs couldn't deliver the guarantees of their variable annuity cousins.
–A surge of interest in indexed life insurance followed, with its theme of index participation without downside risk.
–A lower interest rate environment has led to a transformation of universal life, from a tax-efficient accumulation sale to an extended death benefit guarantee sale, where lapses may be a good thing for the carrier and where the typical customer is over 55 (and even 65) years old.
–In the same low interest environment, whole life has held its own, and even picked up market share in recent years.
Meanwhile, regulatory activities have steered the life insurance industry towards more analyses, greater disclosure, and a strong focus on suitability.
Technology has enabled insurers to know more about their business than ever. Those capabilities will be needed as more sophisticated financial analyses will be required going forward.
The tax treatment of life insurance has come under almost constant threat, but the fundamental tax rules have withstood these threats. Most tax activity has been in clarifying treatment of existing elements.
Distribution of life insurance is still dominated by captive and independent producer specialists. Banks, wirehouses and direct marketers have picked up some volume, but are still minor players.
Sales compensation is still heavily heaped, maybe increasingly so in the independent agent space.