Beta Morphs From Alpha

February 03, 2010 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

There was a lot of talk at IMCA's 2010 New York Consultants Conference about whether Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis are dead, wounded or still functioning after a swoon. How do you regress to normal returns–meaning companies must start to grow again–after a severe, sudden contraction of the economy that cannot recover to previous levels of growth until jobs are robustly being added? According to Nouriel Roubini, the U.S. needs 150,000 a month just to sop up new talent–that doesn't count re-employing the 25 million unemployed or underemployed in the U.S.

This may sound overly simplistic but, if a primary driver of our economy is consumption, at around 71% of GDP, and those 25 million people are not consuming they way they did before, and employed consumers are still reticent to spend, fearing they, too, will lose their jobs–then where would the growth in corporate earnings come from that would make securities prices regress to the mean, that is, upward?

Andrew Lo opened his talk at IMCA in January by asking, "Who needs a hug?" After all, the assembled 800 or so brokers, investment advisors, executives and journalists, most of whom had heard Nouriel Roubini, the New York University's Stern School of Business economics professor, speak about the potential for a double-dip recession and "anemic" recovery. Even as he began to impart his thinking about the difficult lessons of the past two-and-a half years, Lo was a bit more upbeat than "Dr. Doom,"–as Roubini is frequently called–conveying to the assembly the "Creation Myth of Financial Professionals: In the beginning (1964), Harry Markowitz and Bill Sharpe said, 'Let there be beta,' and it was good."

In addition to his role as Chairman and Chief Investment Strategist at the quant investment management firm AlphaSimplex Group, LLC., Lo is the Harris & Harris Group professor of finance at MIT's Sloane School of Management and director of MIT's Laboratory for Financial Engineering.

As he began his talk, Lo pointed to "Gaps in traditional wisdom," and literally blasted away the traditional portfolio theory in his presentation, complete with startlingly loud bomb blast noises and accompanying pictures. "We got hit by the mother of all financial dislocation." He spoke compellingly about his theory that the investment thinking that is the bedrock of investing is not irrelevant–but incomplete. More diversification is necessary.

Alpha, over time, morphs into beta–it cannot remain alpha, Lo posits, when huge amounts of assets pile in and everyone starts to invest to replicate that alpha, and alpha evolves into beta. Hedge funds are a case in point for Lo–calling them, "the Galapagos Islands of finance–you can actually see evolution taking place." He says the "clear trend over time," is that even though the unique skills of managers who generate alpha are valuable, "returns diminish over time, alpha becomes beta."

Speaking about the quant meltdown of August 2007, as the depth of the credit crisis and subprime mortgage debacle became evident, some hedge funds had to "unwind equity market neutral portfolios to raise cash." Lo asks: "Why didn't we see this in August 1998?" during the Russian bond crisis. The "amount of money managed differed by a factor of 50–[there was] 50 times more money," in those funds in 2008. "The weight of assets under management creates beta," Lo said. "The more money you throw at alpha, the less it exists. Alpha and beta are dynamic." Investors should, "pay for alpha, not for beta."

The velocity of alpha evolving into beta is accelerating as well, and one reason may be the way it is easy to slice virtually any part of the markets or a strategy into indexes and then ETFs: assets pile in and then as everyone is investing in the same way, it becomes beta. Before, managers with alpha might have had smaller amounts of assets to control, slowing that evolution a bit.

So, back to MPT: is it time to throw out MPT? "No," says Lo, "but it's incomplete…needs to be revised…it's not wrong to say we should diversify but it's incomplete." The bottom line for Lo may that in terms of "adaptive markets…Charles Darwin has more to do with economics and finance than Adam Smith."

Comments? Please send them to [email protected]. Kate McBride is editor in chief of Wealth Manager and a member of The Committee for the Fiduciary Standard.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center