Guide Eyeballs Pension Plans

February 01, 2010 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

The National Institute of Retirement Security contends in a new pension research guide that the shift away from defined benefit pension plans and toward defined contribution plans is hurting many Americans who are close to retirement.

NIRS, Washington, a not-for-profit that studies retirement security, spotlights the role of DB plans in today's world of growing private-sector use of DC plans.

Benefits from traditional DB pensions go a long way toward providing for the retirement security of Americans, NIRS researchers write.

Pointing to data from the Social Security Administration, they say that Social Security and DB income "remain the largest and most significant sources of retirement income for the current elderly population.

"Among all Americans aged 65 and older, DB pensions make up 17.7% of their current income, while Social Security makes up 36.7%," and, for public sector workers who do not pay into Social Security, DB pensions are even more important, the researchers say.

By comparison, the researchers say there are indications that older baby boomers who are close to retirement and have income only from DC plans are in a less secure position than their DB counterparts. They cite one study that found such boomers are at greater risk of being unable to maintain their pre-retirement standard of living than those with income from DB plans.

Further, they say a recent analysis by NIRS found that a DB plan costs nearly half as much as the DC plan to achieve a target retirement benefit. "That is, the cost to deliver the same retirement income to a group of employees is 46% lower in the DB plan than in the DC plan."

One reason for this is that DB plans pool the longevity risks of large numbers of individuals, the researchers write. That means DB plans need only accumulate enough funds to provide benefits for the average life expectancy of the group, they say. Meanwhile, participants in DC plans need to set aside enough funds to last for the maximum life expectancy to avoid the risk of outliving their money.

Also, DB plans can take advantage of the enhanced investment returns in a balanced portfolio over long periods of time and involving groups of people with a range in ages, the researchers continue. By contrast, they say, those in DC plans must gradually shift to more conservative asset allocation, to protect from market shocks as they age, a process that can force them to sell at an inopportune time.

Several documents in the guide cover the researchers' assessment of why DB plans have declined in the private sector while DC plans have risen, as well as reasons why DB plans continue to be viable and needed, especially in the public sector.

The financial crisis of 2008 has brought heightened attention and concern about how to ensure the long-term health and vitality of retirement arrangements of all types, they note.

The Pension Resource Guide is a compilation of findings from various educational and research materials as well as NIRS own research. Click here to download all sections and fact sheets

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center