The Evolution of Automated Underwriting Software Systems

December 20, 2009 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

1st Generation: These are black box systems which were probably enforced/encouraged on an insurer's underwriting team to ensure consistency as well as a bare minimum standard of underwriting decision making, for example through reinsurers offering discounts where such systems were deployed in a client's underwriting process for new business. These systems are not typically controlled by the insurer, nor does the insurer have the ability to adapt or change them. The sole benefit to the insurer seems to come through the lower reinsurance treaty price. These systems are not easily adapted or changed to meet the changing needs of the insurance company.

2nd Generation: These are systems which are adaptable or changeable-in theory even by the insurance company-they have open interfaces which you can program your underwriting logic against. In practice the level of expertise necessary to achieve this has meant that such changes can generally only be safely made by the original developers of the systems (the vendors, typically reinsurance companies) with one or two notable exceptions where the insurance company has for example, hired staff with deep knowledge of the system who previously worked for the vendor, or where over many years of dedicated effort they have built these skills in-house. These systems can be changed, but only by IT experts with solid programming skills and deep knowledge of the product.

3rd Generation: These are systems where a graphical user interface, or some other mechanism exists to enable an insurer whose underwriters have basic computer literacy (basic here means the typical expertise in office and business software that anyone who uses a PC on a daily basis should have) to extend the system to add new business logic (Underwriting Rules), or change or adapt the existing logic without the dependency on outside expertise such as programming know-how from the IT department or an outside consultant or vendor support. This marks a dramatic leap forward as this generation of system puts power in the hands of the underwriting team for the first time, and removes the dependence on the vendor.

4th Generation: Once ease of use becomes a given, the frontier moves to delivering actionable analysis. 4th Generation systems, in addition to a 3rd Generation User Interface, also provide powerful reporting functionality, giving the underwriters (and other stakeholders such as the VP of Insurance Operations or the Head of Distribution) a deep understanding of the present and past behaviour of their system.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center