Taking The Pulse Of Charitable Planning

November 30, 2008 at 02:00 PM
Share & Print

'Tis the season for giving. Among advisors active in the charitable planning arena, the closing weeks of 2008 will likely call to mind the many opportunities to help realize their affluent clients' philanthropic ambitions. Question is, has the recent credit crisis and the prospect of a severe recession in 2009 put a damper on those ambitions?

To judge by the latest available statistics–from 2007–philanthropy of all types is on the rise. The Glenview, Ill.-based Giving USA Foundation estimated in June of this year that charitable contributions in the U.S. totaled $306.39 billion in 2007, exceeding $300 billion for "the first time in history." The foundation's annual report, "Giving USA 2008," further notes that giving rose in 2007 by 3.9% (1% adjusted for inflation); and that every economic sector, except private foundations, projected increases in 2007.

That was then. Given the seismic events of the past few months, the results of next year's report might look radically different. For advisors, the burning issue is not the contracting economy's effect on overall giving, but on that part of the pie in which they have to role to play: using life insurance to help fund clients' planned (or lifetime) gifts.

To a certain degree, sources tell National Underwriter, a client's decision to pursue or put on hold charitable planning is insulated from the financial turmoil because the process is slow and time-intensive, often requiring many months or years for advisors to convert a client's charitable inclinations into an actionable plan.

To the extent that clients are also intent on establishing a legacy to benefit their community or society, then philanthropic interests may also trump other financial considerations. Those, however, who are motivated chiefly by tax considerations are more likely to postpone gifting until market conditions and the tax environment become more favorable.

"Frankly, taxes are much less of an issue when you're doing testamentary planning," says Randy Siller, a family wealth advisor at Siller & Cohen, Rye Brook, N.Y. "But as asset valuations have declined in recent months, many of the tax incentives for doing lifetime gifting have gone away."

Siller cites, for example, the inter vivos charitable remainder trust, long a favored vehicle among the affluent. By donating highly appreciated assets to the trust, donors can secure an income tax deduction. And by selling the assets inside the trust (executed to secure an income stream or interest for the themselves and a "remainder interest" for a designated charity) they can also avoid capital gains tax.

Siller notes that interest in the inter vivos CRT, which dipped after 2003 because of a decline in the long-term capital gains rate (it now stands at 15%), has declined further because assets that appreciated in boom times–most notably real estate, stock and businesses–now are suffering depressed valuations. Given the prospect of incurring losses, affluent clients are less likely to sell such assets. Or because no gain (or substantial gain) can be expected from a sale, the tax-favored treatment accorded the CRT becomes less attractive.

Among clients for whom tax considerations are paramount, the charitable lead trust and its permutations, the charitable lead annuity trust (CLAT) and charitable lead unitrust (CLUT), also are seeing less interest than in prior years. Distinguishing the CLT from a CRT is the order of the beneficiaries: The first pays an income interest to the charity and a remainder interest to non-charitable beneficiaries.

"I don't see charitable lead trusts being implemented as much in today's market," says, Stephanie Enright, a certified financial planner and principal of Enright Premier Wealth Advisors, Torrence, Calif. "In a down market, the CLT is not as attractive because assets are not as highly appreciated. Where the CLT does well is in up markets, especially among the very wealthy."

But if the current economic outlook has reduced lifetime charitable gifting among some clients, it has had on balance a neutral to positive effect among individuals who are seeking a secure retirement income stream or those for whom tax considerations are secondary. Especially popular now, say market-watchers, is the charitable gift annuity, a vehicle through which to transfer cash or marketable securities to a charitable organization issuing the gift annuity in exchange for a current income tax deduction and the organization's promise to make fixed annual payments to the client for life. Annuity payments can begin immediately or can be deferred to some future date.

"In today's economy, people want security," says Bruce Ensrud, a financial consultant for the Colonnade Group, a Minneapolis, Minn.-based unit of Thrivent Financial for Lutherans, also of Minneapolis. "And tax-advantaged instruments like the charitable gift annuity provide the certainty of a steady stream of income."

That income stream can also surpass what the client would otherwise receive by leaving funds targeted for gifting in other retirement income accounts. Ted Contag, also a senior financial consultant at the Colonnade Group, points to an elderly female client who cashed in a $50,000 CD to secure a higher-yielding (and tax-deductible) charitable gift annuity that pays out a quarterly 8.3% interest rate.

Those who don't need the income can simply gift a portion of retirement funds to charity. Legislation enacted by Congress on October 3, 2008 that extends the Pension Protection Act of 2006 through December 31, 2009 allows donors who are age 70 1/2 to make a lifetime gift using funds from their IRA, Roth IRA or rollover IRA without incurring income tax.

Another option for the philanthropically disposed is the donor-advised fund, an easy-to-establish and low cost alternative to creating a private family foundation. Donors enjoy administrative convenience, cost savings and tax advantages by conducting their grant-making through the fund. A key advantage of the fund, sources say, is the vehicle's flexibility. You can, for example, contribute $30,000 annually to the fund, but give only $15,000 per year in grants. Thus, surpluses accumulating inside the fund can be held in reserve for times when, as in the current economy, less money may be available for contributions.

A donor-advised fund can be bolstered further with life insurance. Joseph Cohen, a certified financial planner and principal of Hoyle Cohen LLC, San Diego, Calif., says he paid out $30,000 to purchase a $2.5 million survivorship life policy for a donor-advised fund he established to benefit a community foundation.

"The policy beneficiary is technically the foundation, but actually the money flows into the fund," says Cohn. "When my wife and I die, the fund will receive $2.5 million in life insurance proceeds as a testamentary recipient. Essentially, the fund functions as a charitable ILIT."

Individuals favoring conventional uses of irrevocable life insurance trusts, observers say, can fund an ILIT to replace assets donated to charity, thereby providing an inheritance for children, grandchildren or other trust beneficiaries. The ILIT (or wealth replacement trust) will generally be funded with a second-to-die life insurance policy that pays a death benefit to named beneficiaries (such as adult children) income- and estate-tax free after both insureds (e.g., the parents) pass away.

If avoiding estate tax is not an issue, the client can also gift the proceeds of a stand-alone life insurance policy to a favored charity, free of income tax. Alternatively, the policy holder can attach a rider to the life contract that pays a supplementary death benefit to a named charity. A client can also fund the policy using the distribution payouts of a single premium immediate annuity, says Shane Gurganus, investment advisor representative of Capital Financial Solutions, a member of John Hancock Financial Network, Raleigh, N.C. Gurganus describes the technique as "annuity maximization."

For many advisors, getting clients to add a charitable component to their overall financial or wealth plan–to be outward- rather than inward-directed in disposing of assets they've accumulated over a lifetime–is a key hurdle in the planning process. For some clients, sources say, the invoking of Uncle Sam is motive enough: Some opt to give to charity to avoid a less desirable alternative, paying the estate tax. But experts generally counsel that advisors have an in-depth discussion with clients about their values and the legacy they want to leave after their passing.

"Most people make significant financial decisions based on one element that is their heart and one that is their head," says Ensrud. "Charitable giving is first and foremost a heart conversation. The financial security, mechanics and tax benefits that come from charitable giving are the head part of the conversation."

Also to weigh in any charitable plan, sources say, are family dynamics. By giving to charity, will clients be depriving themselves, adult children or grandchildren of money they need to live on? How can one best balance these competing interests? Are the children sufficiently mature to manage trust assets that are intended for charity or is it best to bring in outside professionals?

To help answer these questions, says Clayton Klein, a chartered financial consultant with the Family Wealth Consulting Group, Rancho Mirage, Calif., advisors can draft a "family legacy statement" that lays out in detail the client's philanthropic goals and objectives. To assure their buy-in, family members who stand to inherit estate assets should also included in charitable planning discussions.

Ultimately, adds Contag, planned giving can be as a rewarding for advisors as for the clients themselves.

"I don't think I'll ever be able to give away $100 million of my own money," says Contag. "But I know that over the years, I'll be able to help redirect hundreds of millions of dollars to institutions that will make a difference in the world. Also, as soon as the conversation moves from how much money can I have for myself to how does wealth that I've accumulated benefit the institutions I love, then tenor of the meeting changes. We then end up with much deeper and rewarding relationships."

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center