Forum's Mitchell: Carriers Putting

August 31, 2008 at 04:00 PM
Share & Print

During LIMRA International's Advanced Sales Forum, held here last month, Maggie Mitchell, the Advanced Sales Committee conference chair and a vice president of advanced sales at Windsor, Conn.-based ING, met for an exclusive interview with National Underwriter Senior Editor Warren S. Hersch to explore the forum's evolution and continuing challenges that advanced sales professionals face.

The following are excerpts.

NU: How has the forum's membership numbers changed in recent years?

Mitchell: Our membership has grown tremendously. The number of committee members has almost doubled in the last 3 or 4 years; and our attendee registration hit a record this year. The bigger numbers have entailed more responsibilities for the committee leadership, but it's all more fun when you're in a growing organization.

NU: To what do you attribute the growth?

Mitchell: Part of it is better marketing, but I also think carriers are putting more value on advanced sales. They realize that, given all the industry's challenges, they need our expertise. And because we're more valued, there needs to be a forum for exchanging information and educating advanced sales professionals about new, cutting-edge techniques and best practices.

As advanced sales departments evolve, we're also taking on more of a consultative role with senior management, legal and compliance reps to help them understand what techniques work and where potential dangers lay. Carriers have deep pockets. And when someone promotes a new concept, the potential liability often comes in our direction.

NU: Does the committee endeavor to track how effectively best practices advocated at the forum are being leveraged by members and their carriers?

Mitchell: We don't now do this systematically. But I can tell you, for example, that beginning 2 years ago we started talking about red flags involving investor-owned life insurance. Over the last 2 years, almost every carrier has adopted our recommended checklist or a similar version to try filtering out bad business. That says to me that attendance at our forums has had a tremendous impact.

NU: Are there nonetheless certain carriers who in your view are not doing their part to encourage their advanced sales people to apply best practices promoted at the forum?

Mitchell: There may well be people who are not fully versed and can accelerate their learning curve by participating in our meetings. With one notable exception, which I'll leave unnamed, every major carrier is represented here.

NU: Is it asking too much of individual advanced sales reps to have expertise in both life insurance and annuities?

Mitchell: That depends on the carrier. Some companies have separate advanced sales divisions that handle only annuities or life insurance products. Other carriers have departments that support both product lines. But more often, a carrier that is a major life and annuity player will have separate advanced sales departments. Sometimes, also, the separate divisions are the result of a merger between carriers.

NU: Does the forum advocate a certain position as to how carriers' advanced sales departments should be structured?

Mitchell: We don't have a position, but we do discuss the pros and cons of organizing one's department a certain way; and we'll talk about best practices for interfacing with folks engaged in sales, distribution, legal or marketing activities. We also do surveys on areas of common interest, such as compensation, staffing and the merits of requiring everyone in a department to be credentialed.

NU: Given the transition many carriers have made from being mutual to publicly held companies, and given the heightened focus resulting from this change on justifying costs to senior management and shareholders, to what extent are advanced sales departments having to operate with reduced resources–and at what expense?

Mitchell: Everyone in the industry is having to operate more efficiently. One result is there is a greater reliance on industry organizations to provide producer training and education. Many advanced sales departments have also inherited training and supervisory functions that used to be done by the career carriers–often expensive support that you can't correlate directly to sales. How to connect everything we do to real premium dollars, and how to prove our worth, is an ongoing challenge. If you can't do this, it's way too easy for senior management to say, 'we don't need the head count.'

NU: What more could advanced sales departments do if they were better staffed?

Mitchell: Producer training is the primary deliverable that most of us feel we can't do enough of because we're stretched so thin. Also, advanced sales in many cases has morphed into sales prevention because, for example, we're having to vet–and sometimes say 'no' to–concepts that aren't financially or legally justified. That's a function we're serving that I wished we didn't have to. But to protect the industry and our carriers, we must.

NU: Has the current economic downturn and the recent crises affecting the financial services sector impacted life insurance companies' ability to deliver the advanced sales training, education and services you've being talking about?

Mitchell: These developments impact carriers' share price and the management of any publicly held company. I don't see these events as removed from the concerns of advanced sales, but I would hope–and expect–that senior management at most carriers take a longer view than today's share price.

NU: Given the challenges that many publicly held carriers face in justifying additional advanced sales training and support for producers, why not revert to being mutual companies again?

Mitchell: I'm not the right person to answer this question, but I will make an observation. Almost everyone in our industry has worked previously for a different carrier. And there are opportunities sometimes to recruit advanced sales people from other carriers. This hasn't been a problem for the last 8 years or so, as departments were decreasing size, not increasing.

We're now all starting to hire again, which is a very good sign. Among our new members are newly hired advanced sales professionals–not all of them from insurance carriers–such as people from Wells Fargo, National Financial Partners and Coventry.

NU: Might the recruitment of members who work for life settlement companies or other sectors of the financial services industry create frictions with those members who represent the life insurance carriers?

Mitchell: We don't always see eye-to-eye, but for the most part interaction among these folks generates healthy conversations–a vetting of views and ideas from different industry perspectives. Many of the [non-carrier members] are here to learn what we have to say about putting filters in place that affect, for example, the life settlement business. They're here to further their own business interests by learning from us.

NU: Going forward, are there areas or initiatives as yet unexplored that the forum committee would like to pursue?

Mitchell: Going forward, our focus will broaden because our membership is increasing. Whenever new members join, they have something to contribute. By virtue or our organic growth, we will expand our topic areas and upgrade the overall consciousness and educational level, which is what we're all about.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center