'Exception'-Based Deferred Comp Meets Multiple Business Needs

August 31, 2008 at 04:00 PM
Share & Print

Business owners often need to secure the services of a key executive for a period of time in order for their business to survive or thrive. Business owners may also count on these executives to purchase the owner's business interest to facilitate an in-house exit strategy. Both of these needs may be met by a new form of nonqualified deferred compensation benefit known as a "short-term" deferral.

Easy to administer

In addition to meeting pressing needs for business owners, this new deferred compensation arrangement is relatively simple to administer. This simplicity is available because, if drafted properly, the arrangement operates free from much of the Internal Revenue Code Section 409A rules for nonqualified deferred compensation.

Generally, the short-term deferral exception provides that if a benefit, which is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, is paid in full to an executive within two and one-half months after the close of the tax year in which the executive becomes entitled to the benefit, then compliance with the remaining rules of Section 409A is not necessary.

Let's look at a specific plan design example that fits within this exception. If an employer has an executive which he or she wants to 'lock-up' for the next 10 years, and is willing to finance a solution, the employer may offer a nonqualified benefit program to the executive with the following simplified plan design. If the executive is still employed with the firm in 10 years, the employer will pay the executive a lump sum of $250,000 no later than 30 days following completion of the 10-year period. It may be easiest to think of this plan as a deferred executive bonus with a very strong handcuff.

As an alternative benefit, the executive may use the lump sum bonus as a down-payment to the business owner on an installment note for the sale of the business. The advantage of this approach is that business dollars are used to finance transfer of the business to a key executive who otherwise might not have the means to make such a purchase.

From a taxation perspective, with a short-term deferral plan, the employer gets a tax deduction when paying the lump bonus to the executive. Prior to that point, the employer receives no tax benefits, unless he or she chooses to create an informal sinking fund to pay the benefit by purchasing a cash value life insurance policy with tax-deferral of policy cash values. The executive is taxed on the bonus when it is paid. If desirable, the bonus amount may be 'grossed-up' for income tax purposes.

If a life insurance policy is used to informally finance the lump sum benefit, a portion of the policy's death benefit could be used for an endorsement split-dollar plan to provide a tax-free death benefit for the executive's family. The executive's cost for this benefit is the tax due on the amount of economic benefit provided, generally measured by government Table 2001. Another portion of the death benefit could serve as key person protection for the business.

If the life insurance policy is used to informally finance the plan, a business owner has two options when it comes time to pay the bonus. The policy itself may be transferred to the executive in satisfaction of the amount owed. If this approach is used, then the fair market value of the policy must be used for valuation purposes. Alternatively, depending upon the policy funding strategy, the business may retain ownership of the policy for cost recovery purposes and use a combination of current cash flow and policy values to pay the promised lump sum.

There are at least two concerns to keep in mind with respect to the short-term deferral exception rules of Section 409A. First, it is important that there be no vesting prior to completion of the 10-year service period. Also, it is not permissible to allow for a subsequent deferral of the lump sum payment as the end of the service period approaches.

The presence of either of these features will likely cause the plan to fail the 409A short-term deferral exception criteria. The result of this failure is that compliance with 409A is required and the plan must now be administered and taxed accordingly. Many small business owners prefer to avoid that outcome.

Key prospects for plan

While this plan design offers simplicity and a meaningful benefit, it is not for everyone. For example, due to the substantial risk of forfeiture rules, this plan design is most appropriate as a nonqualified benefit for non-owner key executives, rather than a benefit for business owner or family members of a business owner.

Although a short-term deferral concept as described above fits within the exception to the definition of deferred compensation in the 409A final regulations, in essence, it is still a form of deferred compensation. For this reason, executives must qualify for 'top hat' status, similar to other deferred compensation plans, to qualify for an exemption under ERISA.

The short-term deferral exception is a true 'sweet spot' in the new Section 409A rules. Astute financial professionals should be mindful of the ways this new opportunity can be used to meet business owner needs.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center