Full Disclosure Indexed Universal Life Report

September 30, 2007 at 04:00 PM
Share & Print

The most recent review of universal and indexed universal life in Full Disclosure featured 115 policies including 33 indexed varieties. On the indexed side this is an increase from 25 just six months ago. To accommodate as much information as possible we have divided the report into two parts with traditional UL products following at a later date. There are two parts of this indexed report with a large chart including illustrated values on a current basis, and one featuring minimum premiums necessary to guarantee the premium and death benefit to age 100, age 121 or for life for two issue classes.

While indexed products are marketed with a simple message of participating in the gains of equity or other market indexes, they can be quite complex to understand and make accurate comparisons. Crediting rates are typically based on the historical performance of an underlying index (there could also be combinations of indexes used) at various durations. Then the methods used to credit value back to the policy can vary widely, as can the participation rates or caps that can limit credited values. Additionally, more policies offer numerous indexes beyond the traditional S&P 500 index. Some policies also offer blending between indexes and even blending with current assumption interest rates like a traditional universal life policy.

In previous editions of Full Disclosure we asked that companies contributing illustrations base them on the S&P 500 Index. Most would have. We also requested that they use an annual point-to-point crediting method (if available). This time out we have asked the companies to provide illustrated figures based on the indexing option and crediting method most representative of how each is marketing a particular product to the end consumer. As you can see by the options and methods used in the current values excerpt, most used the S&P 500 Index as their choice. As always, we try to achieve meaningful comparisons while accommodating the design strategy of products in our reports.

Current illustrations are based on a Male Age 40 with a best nonsmoker class (representing at least 15% of the contracts issued) paying a $7,500 annual premium and a $1,000,000 policy. If our specified premium of $7,500 is too low to illustrate the policy for this age and face amount, the policies are blended with term insurance, if available. The death benefit type is level. However, a column is included with a true increasing death benefit for each policy to indicate which are designed to generate maximum death benefits. All of the data is current for products for sale on July 1, 2007. The minimum premiums to endow and carry each policy are requested as of the latest policy maturity age.

The guaranteed minimum premium excerpt is for long-term (age 100 or lifetime) guaranteed premiums and death benefits. Whether by rider, a minimum premium level or automatically, mechanisms to include the guarantee may differ. Other guarantee variations include duration, pre-payment discounts and other nuances that help differentiate products in a crowded marketplace and serve individual customer needs (in addition to making the jobs of product wholesalers a little more exciting). If a policy is not also featured in the minimum guaranteed premium chart, they do not offer a long-term secondary guarantee but may offer shorter guarantee durations as specified in the main chart featuring illustrated values.

Internal rates of return (IRRs) figures included in the main chart indicate which products are designed to be more efficient in producing cash values, death benefits or providing an all-around solution. The IRR can be applied to cash values as well as death benefits, and we have chosen to measure both at a policy duration of 30 years. Those seeking to analyze the relationship between cash values and death benefits will find the IRR measurement a useful tool. Columns are included to show you what the death benefits would be illustrated under with an increasing death benefit option. It's easy to see, using the provided IRRs, which policies are built to generate death benefits, which is why it would be unfair to compare them under a level death benefit only. These values are meant to be a snapshot of how individual universal life plans are being illustrated on the street as a way to gauge their relative positions for our sample policyholder.

Because of the challenges in not only creating meaningful comparisons, but also in understanding why products act the way they do under hypothetical scenarios, we have omitted the retirement income scenario that usually runs with the charts you see here. The income numbers we received were diverse to say the least. For a product generally used to accumulate cash values (and offer then as usable income at some point) this came as a bit of a surprise. As a result we are taking a closer look at these figures. As usual they are featured in the latest release of Full Disclosure.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center