The continuing decline in traditional defined benefit plans and the contribution limits that exist on defined contribution plans are working to threaten the retirement security for millions of Americans.
But this doesn't have to be the end of the story. After all, wouldn't workers who can afford to supplement their 401(k) or pension plan be attracted to a strategy that provides a pre-determined retirement income benefit, with the advantage of income tax-free receipt? That is, wouldn't they be attracted to a personal defined benefit plan, funded by life insurance?
At this point, many readers may be thinking, "D?j? vu! Didn't we do this before?"
No, this is not a proposal to replay initiatives of 20 years ago, some of which were ill-conceived and misleading to consumers. Rather, it's a proposal to position life insurance in the unique role of strengthening retirement security for a specific, and very large, market segment: The affluent.
There are several reasons why life insurance can be an attractive funding mechanism for these personal DB plans:
o The life policy has no cap on annual premiums ("contribution levels").
o The myriad of investment choices in variable universal life insurance creates substantial accumulation potential.
o Indexed universal life, if chosen, provides cash accumulation potential by linking cash value growth to an external index (i.e. the Standard & Poor's 500).
o Pre-retirement, self-completion benefits are inherent in the life insurance death benefit.
o The plan is not tied to an employer or plan sponsor; it is personal, flexible and custom-tailored.
o At retirement, the money can be accessed income tax-free via loans against the cash value at net rates as low as 0%.