Paying for more government health insurance might be a lot cheaper than requiring employers and individuals to buy health coverage.
A team of researchers lead by Ellean Meara, a health care policy economist at Harvard University, has come to that conclusion in an analysis released by the Employment Policies Institute, Washington.
Berman & Company Inc., Washington, a lobbying firm, organized the institute to look at issues such as minimum wage increase proposals and other wage and benefits proposals from the perspective of employers and others worried about the effects of mandates on employability of low-wage workers.
Meara's team compared the Bush administration's new health insurance tax cut proposal, a proposal to require large and midsize employers to provide health coverage, and a proposal to expand Medicaid to cover U.S. residents earning up to 300% of the federal poverty level.