NAIC Adopts Short-Term Plan For Hybrid Securities

December 31, 2006 at 02:00 PM
Share & Print

A short-term solution for assessing the risk in hybrid securities was adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners even as a work plan for a more comprehensive long-term solution was adopted by the Hybrid Risk-based Capital working group here.

A vote by the NAIC, Kansas City, Mo., to adopt the short-term solution during its winter meeting was unanimous.

The Hybrid RBC working group adopted a work plan with a minor change and intends to continue fine-tuning it. The work plan was developed by the American Academy of Actuaries, which will be studying risk as it relates to hybrid securities.

Earlier in 2006, a short-term solution was reached so that accounting for risk in these securities would be incorporated into risk-based capital calculations for the year. But, regulators were charged with developing a long-term plan that looks at risk.

The Academy plan defines hybrid securities as "those securities whose proceeds are accorded some degree of equity treatment to the issuer by one or more of the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and/or which are recognized as regulatory capital by the issuer's primary regulatory authority."

The document includes examples of risk that range from extension risk to rate volatility and price volatility. The Academy document also notes that while the classification between debt and equity is a focus of the rating agencies and the annual statement, the document focuses on the underlying characteristics giving rise to those risks.

The one change made to the document was the removal of a sentence that noted that receiving input from parties other than the Academy is the responsibility of the NAIC's Hybrid Task Force.

Nancy Bennett, a life actuary representing the Academy, explained that the Academy will look at the risk to the investor and not the risk from the issuer's perspective. An analysis of hybrid risks will look at what the risks are and compare them with how they look in other assets, she continued. For instance, she said, a comparison could look at how extension risks in hybrid securities compare with the risks in CMOs. Bennett said the Academy was starting with a blank slate approach to risks and had no particular position on what RBC should be for these securities.

Chris Anderson, representing Merrill Lynch, said that if the purpose of the plan was to assess risk "efficiently," then it would probably work. However, he said the purpose section of the plan could be more focused–a change that could streamline the project and reduce participants' workload.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center