New Viatical Draft Keeps 5-Year Sale Ban (Updated)

November 30, 2006 at 12:31 PM
Share & Print

North Dakota Insurance Commissioner Jim Poolman has released a new Viatical Settlements model act draft that would require most life insurance policy owners to hold policies 5 years before selling.

Poolman, chair of the Life & Annuities Committee at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Kansas City, Mo., has added a number of exceptions to the 5-year policy retention requirement.

To sell policies early, would-be viators would have to certify to a viatical settlement provider that they had met one or more of the following conditions:

- The policy was issued after the viator exercised conversion rights associated with a life insurance policy, and the old and new policies had provided 5 years of coverage.

- The viators had experienced life-changing events such as retirement from full employment.

- The viators had held the life insurance policies in question for at least 2 years, had paid for the coverage without use of "encumbered assets," and had participated in no agreement to have other parties buy the contracts.

Poolman also addresses topics such as viatical settlement compensation disclosure.

A viatical settlement broker or viatical settlement provider would have to tell viators about "any affiliations or contractual arrangements between the viatical settlement provider and the viatical settlement purchaser, including the amount and method of calculating the provider's compensation," according to the draft.

The draft states that "the term 'compensation' includes anything of value paid or given to a viatical settlement broker for the placement of a policy."

The American Council of Life Insurers, Washington, and other life insurance groups have proposed requiring policyholders to keep policies 2 years. The ACLI has not taken a public position on proposals to set a 5-year retention requirement.

Here in New York at a conference organized by the Life Insurance Settlement Association, Orlando, Fla., Michael Freedman, a senior vice president at Coventry First L.L.C., Fort Washington, Pa., reacted to the latest Viatical Settlements model by asserting that it "continues to seek to impair the property rights" of policyholders.

Nearby, at a conference organized by the Life Insurance Finance Association, Atlanta, Louisiana Insurance Commissioner Jim Donelon said he had not seen significant support for a 5-year moratorium on policy sales.

The NAIC could consider drafting a model regulation dealing with insurable interest, but the idea of life insurers retroactively voiding contracts held by policyholders who failed to keep policies 5 years before selling "raises all kinds of questions in my mind," Donelon said.

"Let the market determine the appropriateness of the transaction," Donelon said.

If insurers "fabricate excuses" to prevent use of legitimate premium financing transactions, "I would feel free to go after them," Donelon said.

On Friday, after the original version of this article was published. Poolman responded to Freedman's remarks by noting that, if a policy is being financed by a third party and the policyholder has not contributed toward the contract, then the policyholder does not have the usual property rights because the policy is not really the policyholder's property.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center