Companies Start Income Ed For Boomer AdvisorsFinally

August 31, 2005 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

Donald Haas, a financial gerontologist and president of Haas Financial Services, Southland, Mich., spends a lot of time speaking with financial advisors and product providers about retirement income planning for baby boomers and others.

What he is finding is that a few providers of income products, solutions and services have started ramping up to educate advisors on this market–but only a few. "Most advisors are still not aware" and they need the education, he says.

Other experts interviewed for this article report the same.

"Things are in the works, and there's a 'stay-tuned' message, but it's still in the very early stages of development," says William Borden Ayers, principal of the Retirement Management Market Practice of Diversified Services Group, Wayne, Pa.

"The companies are feeling their way on this, because it's uncharted waters…and it's complicated by regulations on advisors." Further, retirement income management is different than asset accumulation, and clients need a different set of solutions.

But it's critical that companies move forward on this, he says. The oldest boomers are reaching age 60 and many are getting ready to take income, he points out, and "advisors are the ones to whom boomers will turn for help."

Financial companies need to do more than just talk about income planning opportunities, Ayers insists. "They need to provide advisors with education and tools they need to do this type of work."

He is referring to tools that help boomer clients fully understand how retirement is changing and the importance of income management; that help advisors do the actual planning; and that provide ongoing plan monitoring and maintenance.

Third-party providers, including marketing organizations, software companies and professional designation programs, do offer tools, Ayers allows. But companies need to be there, too, he says.

As noted, a few companies are stepping up to the plate. One is Lincoln Financial Group, Hartford, Conn. It just has launched a series of "retirement income summits." Held in different cities, these summits train advisors on an "income planning process," says Heather Dzielak, vice president-individual annuities business line leader at Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, a Lincoln Financial group affiliate.

Each session offers 4 hours of education (with continuing education credits) on retirement income management plus take-home, action-oriented kits and tools (scripts, questions to ask, etc.) to use in working with clients. The sessions will help advisors "seize the opportunity" in the income market, Dzielak says. Advisors also learn how creating retirement income security for clients will impact their own practice, she says.

The program took 9-12 months to develop, and Dzielak says follow-up and development will run 12-18 more months.

Why such intense focus? "This is our business, going forward," she explains. "It's our long-term focus."

The education effort is definitely on the how-to, indicates Matthew Sharpe, chief marketing officer of the retirement income and investments business of Genworth Financial, Richmond, Va.

This is a huge shift from 3 years ago, he recalls, when building awareness was the main focus and when "hardly anyone knew what annuitization was."

Now, awareness is there, and providers have been morphing existing products into something that delivers income, he says. Examples include securities firms and banks that are promoting income arrangements through managed money accounts, deferred variable annuities and sometimes variable immediate annuities; and insurers that are concentrating on VA withdrawal features, annuitization features and, for fixed accounts, single premium immediate annuities to meet income needs.

(Genworth itself recently did a morph. It embedded an annuitization option–a group annuity called Clear Course–into its 401(k). The option lets participants move money in and out, as with any other VA subaccount, and it also allows annuitizing for guaranteed income purposes.)

More recently, firms are moving to "integrate everything into a service model," complete with education, says Sharpe. Genworth is doing this at 3 levels:

==Educate senior management and distributors on retirement income and its impact on the client portfolio.

==Educate producers on how to transact income business. "We provide case studies and CE classes (through the income management course co-developed by National Association for Variable Annuities and InFRE)," he says.

==Educate individual producers via a dedicated retirement income team.

"There is still a gap between understanding retirement issues and knowing the impact on the client," explains Sharpe. So, integration should help.

Haas points out some other educational efforts. "A couple of companies are offering traditional insurance education, comparable to that offered in the career agency system, to new producers," he says. Also, some variable insurers are providing insurance education to new reps at broker-dealers. (There are product-focused efforts, too, he adds–e.g., rollouts of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits in VAs, complete with education, and a couple of efforts to use trailer commissions for annuitization.)

Furthermore, Fidelity Investments, Boston, just announced it has a Web-based sales program and online retirement planning tool for advisors selling its 401(k). And OppenheimerFunds, New York, has put a Monte Carlo tool (Retirement Income Manager) on its Web site for advisors to use in determining probabilities related to a client's income plan.

Still, not enough advisors are getting the education they need from the companies, Haas says. One conference of insurance and investment reps that he attended brought that point home. The reps ranged from 30 to 60 years old, he says, "but all of them said they would 'never ever' recommend that their clients take money out of their investments, for any reason."

That thinking disturbs Haas, because he says these advisors' boomer clients will soon start having to manage assets from 401(k)s, IRAs, annuities, savings accounts and other vehicles. "And they'll need to manage this for 20- to 30-plus years of retirement–a retirement that will be dramatically different" than for previous generations. Boomers need reps who can offer new types of solutions, he says.

Manufacturers do face a dilemma in offering income education programs to advisors, Ayers allows. "If they develop a generic or holistic program, they may lose the opportunity to steer customers to their products. But if they offer a product-specific program, advisors may doubt the objectivity and put the money elsewhere."

Lincoln did consider that issue in developing its own program, which is holistic and not product specific. However, says Dzielak, if the company stays on the leading edge, "we believe advisors will choose our products." The view is, "we have to win their business every day."

Mark Heath is one advisor who was won over by just such an approach. One insurer he represents has started mailing out monthly sales ideas in income planning, he says. "These are done very well and they help me understand."

This insurer also puts advanced material on its Web site and offers Webcasts on income planning. "From an independent producer point of view, this is an amazing amount of information," Heath says. "I don't get this from my other carriers."

An independent marketing organization also provides Heath with income education and some related software. "It's good stuff and very supportive," he says.

Until these opportunities came along, Heath adds, "I felt like I was wandering in the wilderness" where income planning support is concerned.

The bottom line: The public needs more education about retirement income, concludes Haas. "For that to happen, the advisors who serve the public need to be educated themselves," he says.

Changing from a focus on accumulation to a focus on income will not be easy for some advisors, he allows. They will need to learn not only about income products but also how to factor in risks related to longevity, inflation, markets, interest and changes in Social Security. But he says this is "a major shift" they need to make.

Ayers agrees. The solutions are varied and complex, he says, citing VAs, equity index annuities, living benefits, laddered bond portfolios, equity income portfolios, etc. Structuring an income plan is not as simple as setting up asset allocation and revisiting it in 20 years, he says.

"But, given that the oldest boomers already are turning 60, advisors have a dire need for ongoing income education and information," concludes Ayers.

As for product manufacturers, they do have to survive and take care of existing business, points out Haas. But they should work to manage this and also do the development for the future–because that is what the public needs.

Making the change from a focus on accumulation to a focus on income will not be easy

Changing Conditions

Income Planning Knowledge Base

(2002 to 2005)

Then

Now

Focus centered on accumulation

Focus increased on distribution

Need for income awareness

Need for hands-on education and training

People confused about annuitization

Annuitization a common term

Use one or two products for income

Use many products to create income streams

Work in one financial discipline

Integrate income products and services from all disciplines

Advisors learn on their own

Financial companies start providing income education and tools to advisors

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center