A Matter Of Focus

August 31, 2005 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

By Jack Bobo

Some years ago on a flight from Cody, Wyoming, to Denver, I was seated next to Harold Hook, soon to become CEO of the American General Companies. In the course of our conversation, Hal shared with me his management philosophy and some of the principles upon which it was based. Later in my career I found some of his points to be very helpful. But I remember one aspect of that conversation in particular. He said, "Show me a well-rounded person and I will show you someone with a short radius." His point was that superstars or superproducers have a very long radius in one area and do not worry about being short in other areas.

The person who immediately came to my mind as we discussed this was Ben Feldman, a successful producer. Ben had said to me on more than one occasion that he did not get involved in industry affairs or even civic endeavors because he did not feel he was very good at it. However, he felt he did one thing quite well and that was to sell life insurance. He believed he could be more helpful to various causes if he did what he could do best and then give support with money. I do not believe he worried much about having a short radius in areas other than life insurance or dissipating his energy in a variety of pursuits.

I also have observed that many, if not most, really big superstars tend to focus in one area–extending their radius to the fullest. Many resist suggestions to diversify because they are more comfortable and successful doing what they do best. I know some who even resented company pressure to expand their product line to the point where they opted to become independent, thus enabling them to focus on their best talent and market.

A few decades ago we heralded the entry into the "age of specialization." The idea being that life today was more complex than in prior times and intricate problems required specialists to resolve them. Just as the one-room schoolhouse had given way to more specialized education years before, industry and business needed to focus more intently where their expertise was needed and in demand.

However, despite the hoopla associated with the need for specialization, the reality was somewhat different in many fields of endeavor. Companies merged and conglomerates were formed, many with divisions where they had little or no experience. A few were successful, many were not, and divestitures such as the recent one at Citicorp resulted. Often the reason given for such divestitures was simply that the cultures of the merged companies did not fit. That's really another way of saying they could not properly focus on what they did best, and they had become a company with a lot of short radii.

About 25 years ago our own business began to fall in step with the movement to expanded outreach. There have been some successes but also notable and costly failures. But I believe the most costly aspect has been the confusion in the field resulting from a clash of cultures. The purchase of life insurance involves a long-term commitment, which contrasts with the axiom in the securities business that maintains you should not "fall in love with a security." With securities, there is a time to buy and a time to sell, and a long-term love affair may inhibit one's ability to act wisely.

This clash in cultures may not be a problem for experienced salespeople, but I believe it is difficult for new people in our business and results in a lot of them developing a short radius in multiple areas. There are a number of very successful full-financial service operations in existence, but even there, in most cases there are specialists housed within the company, each offering advice in their own lines of expertise. Also, in some large agencies, I have noticed that a few agents become specialists with securities, while the rest of the agency remains focused on core products.

It is also true that careers evolve and their focus may change. A friend of mine, now in his mid-80s and still producing, wrote me recently and related the change in his own focus. A star producer of life insurance in his younger days, he says he now focuses more on investments. This seems to me a natural evolution–our policyholders age as we do and their needs change, as well. When life insurance, or at least additional insurance, is no longer needed then investments are a logical option to turn to. The long radius is still there–just pointed in a different direction.

My point in writing this is simply to suggest that as we bring new people into our business, we train them to do at least one thing very well rather than, as generalists, trying to be all things to all people. We already have too many practitioners with small radii often offering advice they are not qualified to give. Allow them to grow a long radius to better serve the public as well as themselves.

It is no accident, I believe, that there is no "National Association of Jacks of All Trades," although there may be a few that come close to fitting that description. A jack of all trades is usually a handyman, useful in handling small chores but not major projects. A handyman is nice to have around when needed, but they do not usually live up on the hill next door to the neurosurgeon.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center