Bush Administration Weighs In On Federal Terrorism Reinsurance

June 30, 2005 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

Officials at the U.S. Treasury Department are calling for the federal government to back away from long-term support of terrorism risk reinsurance.[@@]

The department has delivered an assessment of the federal terrorism reinsurance program that was required by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, the act that created the reinsurance program.

President Bush signed TRIA into law to help buffer the U.S. economy from the effects of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Group life insurers have been hoping that the Bush administration would move to expand TRIA to offer protection for group life insurers.

Although the authors of the new TRIA report acknowledge the concerns of group life insurers about the effects of terrorism, they emphasize the need for the private sector to handle group life terrorism risk, and, in general, they favor the idea of eliminating or sharply curtailing federal terrorism risk protection rather than expanding it.

"The report finds that TRIA has achieved its goals of supporting the industry during a transitional period and stabilizing the private insurance market," U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow writes in a letter attached to the copy of the report that the Treasury Department sent to Rep. Michael Oxley, R-Ohio, chairman of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee.

The economy is far stronger today than it was in 2002, and "extending TRIA would have little impact on the economy given its current strength," Snow writes in the letter. "It is our view that continuation of the program in its current form is likely to hinder the further development of the insurance market by crowding out innovation and capacity building. Consistent with its original purpose as a temporary program scheduled to end on Dec. 31, 2005, and the need to encourage further development of the private market, the administration opposes extension of TRIA in its current form."

Any extension of the program should recognize the temporary nature of the program and the need to significantly reduce taxpayer exposure, Snow writes.

"The administration would accept an extension only if it includes a significant increase to $500 million of the event size that triggers coverage, increases the dollar deductibles and percentage co-payments, and eliminates from the program certain lines of insurance, such as commercial auto, general liability, and other smaller lines, that are far less subject to aggregation risks and should be left to the private market," Snow writes.

Snow also wants to limit the ability of plaintiffs to reap excessive profits from terrorist attacks.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center