ACLI Reacts To Terrorism Report

June 30, 2005 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

The Bush administration has included only a few paragraphs of comments about the group life industry in its eagerly awaited report on the federal terrorism reinsurance program.[@@]

Congress called for the U.S. Treasury Department in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, the act that created the federal terrorism reinsurance program.

TRIA expires Dec. 31, and the insurance industry and Congress have been expecting to read the Treasury Department report for clues about what the reinsurance program might look like in the future.

The American Council of Life Insurers, Washington, says it is not surprised by the lack of attention given to group life, given the fact that the current TRIA extension bill makes no mention of group life.

"This was a report about how the law worked," says Jack Dolan, an ACLI staff member. "Group life was not part of the law. The importance of the report to the group life industry is that the finality of the report begins a serious review of a TRIA extension by Congress. We will work diligently to communicate to Congress and the administration the critical importance of adding group life to the program."

The ACLI's argument to Congress and the administration "is that lives, not just bricks and mortar, should be of central importance when Congress crafts an extension to this program," Dolan says.

But U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow writes in a letter accompanying the TRIA report that the administration opposes extension of TRIA in its current form.

"It is our view that continuation of the program in its current form is likely to hinder the further development of the insurance market by crowding out innovation and capacity building," Snow writes.

If Congress does extend the program, then it should "significantly reduce taxpayer exposure," Snow writes.

An extension also should increase the size of an event that triggers coverage to $500 million, from the current level of $5 million, and it should cut reinsurance coverage for commercial auto insurance, general liability insurance and other lines "that are far less subject to aggregation risks and should be left to the private market," Snow writes.

The administration also said that, although it would let injured plaintiffs recover against negligent defendants, it would limit plaintiffs' ability to profit from terrorism-related suits. That stance could lead to the inclusion of extension bill provisions that would draw opposition from some Democrats. Industry lobbyists say demands for tort reform language included in talks on an early federal terrorism risk reinsurance program bill delayed creation of the program until TRIA passed in November 2002.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center