Why Commoditization Is HereAnd What To Do About It

September 30, 2004 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

By

Commoditization has pushed through the insurance product domain like a bulldozer, mowing down unique constructs and boutique pricing for the inevitable result: a level playing field.

Oops, that should say, a level pricing field.

At one time, commoditization was considered a serious factor in sales of old-time simple products, like term and pre-need life insurance. Now, it is extending into other product sales such as universal life, annuities, long term care and more. For advisors and developers who plan to be in the personal financial field for the long pull, its time to listen upand take strategic action.

Here are 5 reasons why commoditization is continuing to expand.

1. Technology. Time was, 5-10 years ago, when technology advances seemed like the very thing that would keep commoditization of financial instruments at bay. After all, the sleek new systems allowed all kinds of rate refinements in life insurance contracts, infinite (it seemed) variation in features and provisions, and multiple options (say, in variable policies). It seemed buyers had more choice than ever, since Product A was so distinct from B, C, D, and so on. The awesome variety in equity index annuity products is but one example.

But now, consumers and intermediaries have availed themselves of their own systems or online services to corral the various contracts and options and bring them into comparative format. They grid products, add up values and decide for themselves which is the price/feature/value winner.

This process does not always produce apples-to-apples comparisons, but those so engaged seem satisfied with the outcome. One fellow I know just put some high-value life policies to his own test and made his decision accordingly. He allows that he may need professional advice for more complex needs, but for now, he thinks running his own numbers and doing his own cost/benefit is just dandy. And, hes going around urging his friends to do likewise.

So, what technology makes possible via diversification, it crunches up in systematization. End result: Commoditization.

2. Patents. As National Underwriter readers already know, the number of filings being made for patents for insurance and financial business processes and methods keeps growing. Many of these are made under Class 705 at the U.S. Patent Office. This class also includes the likes of electronic shopping, advertising management systems and postage metering systems, but financial is right up there at the top, according to the Patent Office Web site. And, though Class 705 apps are but a fraction of other types, their numbers are definitely up.

Where commoditization is concerned, the impact of this trend will be felt via the licensing of the patented processes/methods. If those patents help produce an insurance sales leader, for example, other firms will want to buy licenses for those processes. Once multiple firms buy those licenses, the related products will then be on par with others, thereby creating uniformity, laying the groundwork for subsequent commoditization.

3. Regulations. The regulatory push toward full disclosure and transparency in cost structure is inexorable. Many firms already have responded by showing fees, trimming fees and dropping fees altogether, and product contracts increasingly read like roadmaps. These trends make features and costs more widely known and easier to spreadsheet, priming the pump for commoditization.

4. Changed thinking. Historically, financial people fought like Mother Hens to keep their products away from the commoditizers reach. Yes, some competitors just copied one anothers innovation straight out, changing only the name on the contract, creating post-rollout uniformity anyhow. But that did not change the groupthink against standardization, especially since most firms, in the pre-tech era, still found plenty of ways to differentiate (beyond price).

Now, however, many financial firms willingly put their products and pricing up against one another online, in brokerages, on menu boards and in product tracking services. And many distributors willingly spreadsheet an entire competitive set, if necessary, in order to turn a producers head.

5. Market demand. All of the above wouldnt hold much sway if consumers didnt want both good products and good pricing. But they do and, as exemplified by the fellow above, they will do what they feel they need to do to get it. That man wasnt looking for "excellent product and rock-bottom pricing." But he did want good basic coverage at a competitive premium.

The combined effect is this: No matter how many bells and whistles a product offers, no matter how unique the third-party service it includes, no matter how strong the brand and the financials, insurance and other financial products are being sold in a marketplace that is pushing for more and more commoditization.

Does that put customization in peril? Hardly. The solution is already here: Promote the unique skills of professional and expert advice. Many consumers can put products on a grid, but few can apply the outcome to their own financial needs and plans without help from a specialist. Even that solo shopper mentioned above realizes hes going to need some help, going forward. Its up to the entire financial industry to get the message across that it has trained experts who can light the way.


Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, October 1, 2004. Copyright 2004 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center