KPMG Panelists: Take Broader View Of Risk

September 30, 2004 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

What do you get when you put "plain old risk management on steroids?"[@@]

Enterprise risk management, quipped James Kallman, president of Kallman Consulting Services, Lakeway, Texas, who then talked about the importance of using the new, "more holistic, ERM approach to managing financial and strategic risks.

Kallman and other insurance experts discussed the new approach here earlier this week during KPMG L.L.P.'s annual insurance industry conference.

Don Watson, vice president of enterprise risk management with ACE, Hamilton, Bermuda, said good reasons for an insurer to implement ERM include the need to identify risk and the need to establish a company's appetite for risk.

Watson cited the risk that a court battle over a claim dispute could hurt an insurer's finances and reputation as an example the importance of broad efforts to assess risk. "We are selling our promise to pay," Watson said. "The minute that is called into question, then it raises questions about the viability of a company."

Watson gave real estate investments as another example of the value of ERM. An insurer might say it invests in real estate because of opportunities in that market, but a more useful answer would address why a company could accept real estate market risk and how that risk relates to a range of investment risks, Watson said.

Gideon Pell, chief risk officer at New York Life Insurance Company, New York, said the rating agencies are taking more of an interest in ERM. In fact, he added, he had just come from a meeting with Moody's Investors Service, New York, about the issue.

Pell talked about the shift toward "stochastic" testing of large numbers of possible risk scenarios and away from simple risk-estimation formulas.

Pell said the ERM approach can be compared with the stochastic testing approach because it involves looking at an entire portfolio of risks and the relationships between those risks rather than assessing each individual risk separately.

Robert Semke, a vice president with the Long Island City, N.Y., office of Met Life Inc., said efforts to better assess risk involves both understanding the broad exposure of a company as well as developing a system to report and track risk.

Developing a good ERM system takes dedication of resources, Semke added. For example, Semke said, MetLife devoted 60,000 person hours to implementing Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance in 2003. This year, 100,000 person hours have been budgeted, he reported.

Julie Burke, a managing director with Fitch Ratings' Chicago office, said banks have been more active in adopting the ERM approach than insurance companies have.

For insurers, the practical reason to set up an effective ERM program is that S&P could view that company as not needing as much capital as other insurers with the same rating, according to Mark Puccia, managing director of the insurance group at Standard & Poor's Corp., New York.

Puccia said he has seen insurance company management interest in ERM increase dramatically in the past 2 years.

Although many companies have components of an ERM program in place, few have implemented a full ERM program, Puccia said.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center