Death Benefits Payout Exceeded Value, Says NAVA

September 30, 2004 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

Death Benefits Payout Exceeded Value, Says NAVA


Although the stock market generally went south from 2001 to 2003, beneficiaries of variable annuity investors received death benefits amounting to $2.8 billion more than the value of the annuities in that time. That more than made up for market losses during the period, according to the National Association for Variable Annuities.

NAVA, Reston, Va., bases its findings on a survey of its member companies, which it says represent 95% of VA carriers.

About $355 billion in VA contracts were sold between 2001 and 2003, NAVA says. Because the death benefits paid in the period often were generated from contracts sold earlier, an exact correlation between contracts sold and death benefits paid cant be made.

Still, the study emphasizes the importance of the guaranteed death benefit feature offered by VAs, NAVA says.

The basic death benefit ensures that the investors beneficiaries will receive either the purchase payment or the market value of the annuity at the time of death, whichever is greater.

Most VAs also offer enhanced death benefit guarantees that offer additional benefits, such as a rider allowing investors to lock in market gains periodically, protecting them against future market downturns, NAVA points out.

The point of VAs is that they protect beneficiaries against the insureds death while enabling the insured to take part in the stock market, says Mark Mackey, president and CEO of NAVA.

Even if a $100,000 investment in a VA declined in value by $20,000, if the investor then died, his beneficiary would still receive a death benefit payment of $100,000, Mackey points out.

If that investor had put the same $100,000 directly into a mutual fund, beneficiaries would only receive $80,000 upon his death, he says.

And if the VAs underlying funds rise in value, the beneficiaries would receive that higher value as a death benefit.

Experts caution, however, that advisors should not recommend VAs for every investor.

John Gannon, vice president of investor education for the National Association of Securities Dealers in Washington, points out that some advisors inappropriately recommend exchanges of one type of VA for another. That actually can cause a loss for the investor, due to penalties imposed by carriers if an exchange is made before a certain period, usually 5 to 7 years.

"The broker is also responsible to assure that a VA product and its subaccounts are suitable for the investor," he adds. "One thing they need to look at is, does the investor have a long-term investment objective? Or are they going to need the money sooner than 7 to 10 years or before they reach age 59 ? Because then they would have to pay a 10% tax penalty typically, as well as ordinary income tax."

Elderly people who may not have many years to live and who may need money for medical or other emergencies also may be unsuitable candidates for VAs, Gannon says.

Before recommending a VA, the advisor should also find out if the individual is already contributing the maximum amount to a retirement account, such as a 401(k).

"VAs offer tax-deferred savings, but that is post-tax, while 401(k) contributions are pretax and in most instances will be a better deal," says Gannon.

He notes that the NASD has proposed suitability rules for sales of VAs, which the Securities and Exchange Commission is currently considering.


Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, October 1, 2004. Copyright 2004 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center