A Whole New Meaning

September 30, 2004 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

Mutuals Lose Sec. 809 Tax Fight For 2004

Washington

The nations approximately 50 mutual life insurance companies have lost an effort to escape payment of a tax on dividends paid to policyholders this year under a 1984 law that sought to balance the interests of stock and mutual insurers, and there is some doubt whether the mutuals will continue their effort since Congress voted earlier this year to terminate the tax effective January 2005.

The provision is known as Sec. 809 of the IRS Code. A provision suspending it for 2004 was added to the expanded middle class tax bill by Senate conferees to the measure, but adding the provision was rejected by House conferees late Wednesday; the revised bill was passed by both the House and Senate Thursday.

The provision forces mutual life insurers to effectively prepay tax on income later distributed to policyholders in the form of dividends, lawyers and lobbyists for Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance have contended in leading the fight to have the provision terminated. An industry lobbyist who declined to be named but represents a number of the institutions who have lobbied fiercely and effectively to terminate the provision said the Joint Tax Committee estimates the cost to mutual insurers this year at $50 million. However, since the provision can be averaged out because the provision has been suspended for the past three years, it is difficult to say precisely how much it will cost the industry in taxes for this year.

"It is not clear if there is any savings associated with suspending it for 2004 because it takes three years to aggregate total cost," the lobbyist said.

The mutual industry was successful in adding a provision ending the tax effective January 2005 to a pension bill passed earlier this year.

A provision suspending the tax for this year is included in the so-called FSC/ETI bill (foreign sales corporation/extraterritorial income tax regime) that is also the subject of a House-Senate conference, but there are deep concerns about whether Congress will get to that bill this year.

Therefore, industry lobbyists persuaded Senate conferees to include the provision in the bipartisan middle class tax cut bill that raced through the Congress, but the effort failed.

Senate conferees Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Don Nickles, R-Okla., supported the insurers, but Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the panel, voted no. The Senate conferees vote became moot when House conferees William Thomas, R-Calif., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and Tom DeLay, R-Texas, House Majority Leader, opposed it.

Among the institutions lobbying for suspension of the tax for 2004 were MassMutual, New York Life, Northwestern Mutual and Guardian Life. In the aggregate, mutual life insurers now control 10% of the market, in contrast to 1984, when the tax was imposed, when they controlled 55% of the market.

Besides the large mutuals, there are approximately 40 smaller life mutuals, one industry official estimated.

While some sources told Congress Daily the mutual insurers will continue the fight, a lobbyist told National Underwriter that remains to be decided.

"Were considering our options," the lobbyist said. "It is unclear whether we will pursue this."

He explained that if the "Chairman [Thomas] opposes you, it has to give you pause as to whether you will proceed in the face of that."


Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, October 1, 2004. Copyright 2004 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center