The Securities and Exchange Commission voted January 23 that
lawyers must inform companies' top executives, and even members of their
boards, of securities violations at the firm. However, the SEC's hotly
contested "noisy withdrawal provision" is "still a live wire," says John
Heine, an SEC spokesperson. The noisy withdrawal provision, which lawyers
have opposed, would require lawyers to snitch on corporate clients by
telling the SEC of a securities infraction at the firm, and then resign from
advising that firm if it failed to heed the lawyer's warnings.
The SEC extended the comment period on the noisy withdrawal provision for
60 days, and proposed an alternative rule that would require a corporation,
not a lawyer, to report a lawyer's resignation to the SEC. "Notice to the
public [of a lawyer's withdrawal] would come by way of the issuer [company]
filing an 8-K form" with the SEC, Heine says. The alternative proposal is
also open for a 60-day comment period.
Gene Cauley, a partner with the law firm Cauley Geller Bowman Coates &
Redman in Little Rock, Arkansas, says the SEC is being "cautious and
deliberate" by extending the comment period on the noisy withdrawal