Variable Product Companies Cautioned To Be Vigilant On Money Laundering

June 30, 2002 at 08:00 PM
Share & Print

Variable Product Companies Cautioned To Be Vigilant On Money Laundering
By

Washington

Variable products are becoming an increasingly popular vehicle for illegal money laundering and law enforcement authorities will be taking a much closer look at them, panelists told a meeting of the National Association for Variable Annuities.

Janice B. Sharpstein, an attorney with the firm of Jorden Burt LLP, told NAVAs Regulatory Affairs Conference that variable product companies can stumble into money laundering in the ordinary course of conducting business.

She noted that the USA Patriot Act, which was enacted in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack and requires financial services providers to comply with federal anti-money laundering statutes, covers a variety of activities, not just terrorism.

Indeed, Sharpstein said, some 67 specific activities, including food stamp crimes, espionage, gambling and terrorism, are covered by anti-money laundering statutes.

Violation of these statutes, she said, can lead to indictment and conviction for money laundering.

Robert Watts, senior vice president and chief financial officer of John Hancock Financial, noted that some people in the insurance business still believe insurance products cannot be used for money laundering.

But he cited one real world example of how it was done.

An insurance company, which Watts did not name, was contacted by a cash-rich business that had a pool of money that representatives of the business said they wanted to shelter from the government.

The representatives, Watts said, were not interested in the details of the product. They were very hard to reach at times and declined to provide the insurer with any personal data.

The business address was the only address provided, Watts said, and the only telephone number provided was for a cell phone.

The representatives said they wanted to wire a large amount of cash, and wanted everything done quickly, Watts said. They suggested that if the insurer didnt agree, they would go elsewhere.

Finally, Watts said, the representatives promised future business, such as estate planning, to suggest the possibility of a long-term relationship.

Eventually, he said, the representatives wired $2.2 million for the purchase of three variable annuity contracts.

Only about two weeks later, Watts said, the insurance company received a request for full surrender of the contracts with the funds to be wired to a bank.

Shortly thereafter, he said, federal law enforcement agencies began conducting a probe of the transaction.

Sharpstein said this example is full of red flags insurers need to recognize.

These include wanting to do business on a cash basis, the lack of interest in the details of the product, the difficulty in contacting the representatives and the demand that everything be done quickly, she said.

While the Treasury Department is still developing regulations on anti-money laundering that will apply to insurance companies, which will be released by Oct. 26, 2002, Sharpstein said insurers might want to consider taking some steps in the interim.

First, she said, insurers should identify products and customers that do and do not pose a hightened risk.

Some criteria to consider include whether the customer is an individual or an intermediary, whether the customers business is one that is more likely to be involved in illicit activities and whether the customers home country has adequate anti-money laundering controls.

In addition, Sharpstein said, insurers must adequately train their own employees to help them identify possibly suspicious transactions.

A good rule of thumb, she said, is to devote the same degree of training to anti-money laundering as the company devotes to other concerns, such as marketing.

Attendance at training sessions should be mandatory, Sharpstein said, and should include a sign-in sheet.

These are the types of things the federal government will look at to see if the company is in compliance with anti-money laundering statutes, she said.

Sharpstein said companies should take steps to minimize their exposure. In particular, she said, they should establish procedures for in-house communications and be very careful with e-mails.

E-mails, she said, should never contain derogatory or sensitive comments, off-color jokes or negative comments about customers or the companys products.

Often, Sharpstein said, when a company is indicted for money laundering, the federal government will use e-mails to try and put the company in a bad light. "E-mails can kill you," she said.

Watts said willful blindness to money laundering is no excuse. Indeed, he said, companies that close their eyes to these activities may actually be worse off, legally.

"What you dont know can hurt you," Sharpstein added.


Reproduced from National Underwriter Life & Health/Financial Services Edition, July 1, 2002. Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center