Life Insurers Ceding More And More Mortality Risk

March 31, 2002 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

Ceding mortality risk of primary companies to life reinsurers is becoming more common.

Drivers of this change include life insurers changing business model, aggressive reinsurance pricing and increased use of quota share reinsurance, a type of reinsurance in which direct writers and reinsurers share a set percentage of risk.

Many direct writers are shedding non-core business lines, focusing on product manufacturing and distribution, and transferring insurance risk to free capital for other activities.

The trend toward ceding life insurance risk has been rapid and unrelenting, with 15% ceded in 1993, 32% in 1996 and 64% in 2000 as measured by the percentage of life insurance contracts ceded to reinsurers.

Fitch Ratings has a mixed view of this trend for life insurers. On one hand, the attractiveness of the pricing makes this a compelling business decision for direct writers as they lock in mortality experience below pricing assumptions.

On the other hand, life insurance produces stable, predictable financial results. As companies move away from their core life insurance products, they are generally shifting their business mix toward lower-margin, less predictable, potentially shorter-term earnings streams.

Life reinsurers find this business attractive for several reasons, but the most important is growth. The average growth rate of premiums over the past 10 years is 20%, versus direct life premium growth of 5% and nominal growth in non-life insurance premiums.

Many life reinsurers are part of larger reinsurance groups such as Swiss Re, Munich Re and Employers Re. Life reinsurance provides a predictable earnings stream relative to the volatile non-life reinsurance business. Therefore, these companies can diversify their business mix, which stabilizes operating results and thus reduces overall risk.

The large life reinsurers can capture economies of scale in operations and risk profile. Since life reinsurance is not an administrative-intense line of business, companies can add to in-force at relatively low marginal costs. Also, the larger, more diverse mortality pool allows reinsurers to accept smaller margins than direct writers.

Fitch believes the primary risk for life reinsurers is potential inadequacy of pricing. Much of the downward trend in reinsurance rates is predicated on assumptions of continued improvements in mortality. If these improvements do not materialize, then reinsurers will have to increase reserves in the future.

A potential competitive challenge to life reinsurers is securitization, which involves taking the cash flow from a block of assets and liabilities, and converting it to a security that is sold in the capital markets. To date, there have been few life insurance-related securitizations completed. Fitch believes this is not a material threat to life reinsurers in the near-term.

The life reinsurance business has undergone significant consolidation in recent years. In just the past six years, nine of the top 18 reinsurers were acquired. Swiss Re was most active, acquiring four reinsurers including Lincoln Re, Mercantile & General, CIGNA Re and Life Re. Now, Swiss Re represents approximately 30% of the U.S. life reinsurance market. The top five life reinsurers represented 68% of 2000 life reinsurance assumed on a pro forma basis.

The benefits of consolidation for life reinsurers can include expense efficiencies, broadened mortality profile, product diversification, expanded distribution and additional management talent. Several reinsurers, such as TransAmerica and RGA, changed ownership as part of a larger transaction and not specifically a reinsurance-only consolidation.

Several startup companies have entered the U.S. life reinsurance market over the past several years. These companies have been offshore entrants that have used their tax advantage in some niche markets. To date, results for these startups have been mixed.

Fitch expects some continued consolidation over the next several years. Likely acquisition candidates are those reinsurers that are not considered a core operation of their owner. Likely acquirers include existing life reinsurers that want to grow scale, non-life reinsurers that want to diversify into the life business and foreign reinsurers that want to grow their U.S. presence.

Rating implications for life reinsurance acquisitions are dependent on the purchase price, acquisition financing, managements track record, financial strength of the companies involved and integration plans. Given that research shows the majority of acquisitions do not meet managements expectations, Fitch will be somewhat skeptical of financial projections when assessing transactions.

Julie Burke, CPA, CFA, is a managing director with Fitch Ratings in Chicago.


Reproduced from National Underwriter Life & Health/Financial Services Edition, April 1, 2002. Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center