Hey, Folks, Insurance Is Back In Vogue

March 31, 2002 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

By

Insurance. If you said the word in polite company a few years ago, even a year ago, you had to prepare yourself for some nasty cracks by insurance-hating friends and family members.

You had to, because you knew, beyond any doubt, that in polite company, insurance had become a dirty word.

Now, many signs–including dollar signs–suggest that insurance, or at least what insurance represents, is no longer as repugnant as it once was.

Industry professionals have picked up on the scent, and are already responding. Before assessing this new trend, lets review the underpinnings.

In the financially robust 1990s, insurance-hating was in vogue in many consumer circles. Targets of public ire were the industrys legalistic contracts, its dull and drab guarantees, and/or its failure to deliver as promised.

Insurance was often blamed for: doctors and hospitals not providing certain services; injured loved ones receiving insufficient disability benefits (or none at all); friends being sold inappropriate policies; neighbors having their life policies "blow up;" and on and on.

This alone was enough to make insurance pros want to cringe. They didnt like being tarred with the bad-boy brush that was intended for the bad actors in the business.

As the decade continued, another trend kicked in that bolstered I-word discontent. This was enactment of Gramm Leach Bliley Act of 1999–legislation that allows insurers, banks, and securities firms to sell one anothers products and, in effect, to build a broad-based financial solutions industry.

To some marketers, GLBs arrival meant the time had finally come to downplay insurance as a unique industry. Hence began the quiet tucking away of the I-word into non-I wrappers.

Insurance companies began promoting themselves as financial services corporations, manufacturers, and/or providers. Various industry trade groups and third-party providers dropped insurance from their names and/or added financial or related terms to their monikers. Industry practitioners began presenting themselves as financial professionals, financial services advisors, and the like.

These various interests didnt ditch the I-word entirely. (After all, insurance is part of the laws and regulations of the land.) Nor did everyone hop on the shirk-the-I-word bandwagon–certainly not the very go-go long term care specialists!

Still, for much of the decade, the tilt in the non-I direction was pronounced. Many, I noticed, mentioned insurance almost as an afterthought. As in: "Were a financial solutions firm and we use all kinds of products–mutual funds, annuities, private placements, and, yes, insurance, too…"

Now, fast forward to today. It seems insurance is back in vogue.

The first wind of this came last year, when producers started reporting more people were applying for life insurance than previously. The twin drivers, they said, were the recessionary economy and the war on terrorism.

LIMRA International has since confirmed the uptick in individual life sales, particularly universal life, which saw its 2001 annualized premiums rise 18% over 2000. (See NU, Feb. 4, 2002.)

Thats not all. Fixed annuity sales rose, too–by 36% in 2001 compared to 2000, says LIMRA (see NU, March 18, 2002.) So did equity index annuity sales; they jumped 20% in 2001 compared to 2000, says The Advantage Group, St. Louis, Mo. (see NU, March 18, 2002.)

Meanwhile, many variable annuity marketers tell me that, although VA sales are down industrywide, clients who do buy VAs in todays market greatly prefer contracts that sport "insurance features" such as income and death benefit guarantees, etc.

Does this mean the industry is shape-shifting back to promoting itself primarily as an insurance provider?

No–at least, not in the sense that television stations pump out re-runs. No one is trotting out their old insurance marketing names, for instance, and no one is shunning their full financial services affiliations or alliances.

But yes–in the sense that the "financial services industry" is taking advantage of its flexibility. Since safety and guarantees seem to have come back into favor today, and since many kinds of insurance address those concerns to a T, the industry is adapting its marketing messages accordingly.

Already, I am seeing firms push their fixed product solutions and their safe money approaches to the front burner. Im seeing agencies announce, "Weve got insurance and other financial service solutions for every need." Im seeing insurers trot out guarantee-rich products and emphasize safety and protection in their sales literature.

This is not just a fixed product fling. The trend is showing up in other financial lines, too.

Just a few weeks ago, ING Funds, Scottsdale, Ariz. announced launch of a new mutual fund that offers investors an opportunity for "long-term growth, plus a five year-period of guaranteed downside protection" (emphasis added). In the very same week, Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America, Minneapolis, debuted a long term care policy that, among other things, " guarantees the premium rates for five years" (emphasis added).

Safety, security, protection, guarantees, risk-bearing, and, yes, insurance–these are todays marketing messages.

It sounds a lot like old times, except that today, the messages are coming from full financial services providers, not the insurance biz, per se. The sales results from 2001 suggest that some of these messages have fallen on receptive–and responsive–ears.

Now, the hope is, the financial services industry will keep its clean-jean profile, so it wont need another makeover down the road.


Reproduced from National Underwriter Life & Health/Financial Services Edition, April 1, 2002. Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center