Good Deals Doable Despite Bad Year

March 31, 2002 at 07:00 PM
Share & Print

By

Twin jolts of economic volatility and the Sept. 11 attacks have not diminished the capital that life reinsurers say they need to complete deals.

"I dont think there are any capacity issues," according to Scott Willkomm, president of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings Ltd., George Town, Grand Cayman.

"I think theres adequate capital to do just about any transaction," agrees Richard Leblanc, a vice president of structured reinsurance at Manulife Financial Corp., Toronto. "I dont think theres a big decrease in capacity."

But the executives admit the turmoil has made them choosier about what they see as a good deal.

Financial reinsurance executives are acutely aware of the risks they face, even in good times, and even when the "transfer of risk" looks small to outsiders, because their companies charge just a fraction of a cent for each dollar of reinsurance.

"Were taking a very small piece of the upside, and a very big risk on the downside," Leblanc says.

Definitions vary widely, but Leblanc defines financial reinsurance as the use of reinsurance to solve problems beyond simply shifting traditional underwriting risk.

A financial reinsurance arrangement might transfer risk associated with the timing of claim payments; risks related to the total, final cost of claims that are already payable; investment risk; or other types of risk.

The ceding insurers see financial reinsurance as a tool for accomplishing tasks such as disposing of unwanted blocks of business, converting anticipated streams of income into ready cash and buffering income statements from financial shocks.

The life financial reinsurance market has been growing about 18% per year, Willkomm estimates.

One obstacle is regulators concern that some reinsurance arrangements might simply be carefully disguised loans, or transactions that do little but make income statements and balance sheets look better.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Kansas City, Mo., included strict rules for risk transfer in a 1992 life and health reinsurance model regulation. If a reinsurance arrangement fails to transfer the right amount of risk, or the right kinds of risk, regulators in states that adopted the model might ignore the reinsurance when evaluating an insurers financial strength.

When insurers enter into reinsurance arrangements solely to make the balance sheet look better, "generally speaking, those contracts do not qualify as reinsurance," says Beth Vecchioli, deputy director at the Florida Division of Insurer Services, Tallahassee.

Regulators have been vocal about the "window dressing" issue in Australia and the United Kingdom.

In Australia, investigators with the HIH Royal Commission, a government agency, have accused a property-casualty insurer of using financial reinsurance contracts that involved no actual transfer of risk to hide its poor finances. When another insurer, HIH Insurance Ltd., acquired the company, the hidden problems surfaced and killed HIH, the investigators argue.

In the United Kingdom, regulators with the Financial Services Authority say a large London life insurer used financial reinsurance to conceal its financial weakness.

At other insurers, "we have found some more examples of arrangements where it is wholly unclear whether any risk has in fact been transferred, and where the motivation seems purely presentational," FSA Chairman Howard Davies said in a January lecture, according to a copy of the speech on the authoritys Web site.

Big U.S. life insurers that have recently demutualized also show a tendency to use financial reinsurance to dress the windows, according to Rodney Clark, an insurance rating analyst at Standard & Poors, New York.

But some reinsurance arrangements "are more reasonable than others," Clark says. "I am not concerned about the [lack of] transfer of mortality risk if theres transfer of other risk, such as lapse risk or investment risk."

Most deals arranged by smaller life insurers do seem to involve a significant transfer of risk, Clark says.

Meanwhile, financial reinsurance executives want to make sure their companies are taking risks they can really afford to take.

At Manulife, "what we want is a fairly low volatility product," Leblanc says.

Leblanc looks for stable ceding insurers in stable lines of business, and comfort with both the clients product and the clients projections.

Of course, the buyers have similar concerns.

"There is a subtle flight to quality that is in the minds of the ceding companies," Willkomm says.

The Sept. 11 attacks have had a much smaller effect on financial reinsurance than on traditional reinsurance, but medical cost inflation has hurt the market for medical financial reinsurance, and the ups and downs in world stock prices and U.S. interest rates have made annuity deals considerably less attractive, the executives report.

In coming years, regulator and rating agency scrutiny could also pose a challenge for financial reinsurers, Clark says.

If so, the industry could move toward other methods of "alternative risk transfer," such as using blocks of life insurance and annuity business to back securities, Clark says.

Many credit card companies, mortgage companies and property-casualty insurers securitize business, but life securitizations have been rare.


Reproduced from National Underwriter Life & Health/Financial Services Edition, April 1, 2002. Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center